Dalit-Online
Weekly e news paper
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. special..edition.5................28/02/2021
RTI
APPLICATION TO CPIO RESERVE BANK OF INDIA MUMBAI
Refer RTI APPLICATION No:
RBIND/R/E/20/04870
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY
REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION
SOUGHT BY ME.
WITH RESPECT TO CASE
NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
& SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER
MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEET NO staff
no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended charge
sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985
1. Why didn't you notice
the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?
2. This crime came to
light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities
, but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division
working properly ?
3. why there is no
security check up of officers during entry & exit
out of premises ?
4. why there is no
individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of
reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done,
why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for
sorting ?
5. Immediately after
noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those
sections ?
6. why did not you take
steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to
such high profile crime ?
7. why didn't you
immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
8. Why RBI has left out ,
so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period
than accused officers ) from domestic
enquiry ?
9. why CBI also failed to
put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
10. is it because they
were in favorable terms with the vested
interests ?
11. did the CBI dance to
the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet
& during investigation , instead of
independent investigation
?
12. those left out
probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of
evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court
proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are
not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true
criminals get away ?
13. in normal times ,
what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for preserving old
documents / records ?
14. after noticing such a
high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve
such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts
of law as & when demanded. But it didn't ,
why ?
15. does not this point
to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?
16. RBI authorities have
conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries ,
is it not detrimental to the rights of
defense ?
17. RBI authorities have
stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent
of each other & are not binding on one
another. However
RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the
court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court
of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18. The alleged
crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why
this long delay ?
19. didn't this
facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
20. as stated before
court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who
is responsible for it ?
21. has the CBI conducted
enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN ,
W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?
22. is it not due to
inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that
such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23. what disciplinary
action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher
officials ?
24. whatever internal
rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such
internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental
rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way
of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25. as per RBI pension
regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the
bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is
proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out
clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?
26. judicial courts of
law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry
committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings.
Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram
into service , why ?
27. even if an employee's
misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying
him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction
of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's
case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the
central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28. RBI alleged that
mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank &
recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to
recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
29. ideally, domestic
enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then
the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's
case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a
result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures
RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date
& gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of
domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it
not illegal & contempt of court ?
30. ideally , RBI
authorities should have appealed to higher court
against lower court order
discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?
31. did the RBI pay
interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
32. the undue delay in
filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour
/ contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings ,
dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all
point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What
disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI,
S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33. why charge sheet was
amended? Is it legal ?
34. did the charge sheet
was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by
including cancelled note vault in the charge
sheet ?
35. does not this itself
show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but
a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents
from actual criminals ?
36. is it true that that
only 5% of sample inspection is done out of
bundled verified
defective note packets ?
37. is not the conduct of
joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted
officers illegal ?
38. how come such an
important evidence 22nd note packet went
missing ?
39. is it because it may
point towards real criminals ?
40. as per the statement
of management witness / inspection head /
expert mr.vijendra rao ,
the notes of earlier dates have been removed
from packets made into
new bundles , right ?
41. as per his statement
, entire certificates , seals of some asst
treasurers are there ,
who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
42. does not it show that
some body else was misusing the seals ,
putting some innocents
seals over the notes ?
43. does it not show that
, crime has taken place at verification
section ?
44. does it not show
involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45. why asst treasurers
have not been charge sheeted ?
46. why inspection of RBI
Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?
47. is it not true that
you failed to produce all records showing
internal inspection /
audits , during domestic enquiry & court
proceedings ?
48. your expert
mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated
some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated
that this seal mark is exactly this , so he
himself is not 100% sure
?
49. your expert nowhere
said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,
on that day this seal was
issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50. your expert says
during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud.
However approver says
fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no
action has been taken ?
51. why you didn't
produce all records of all persons , who have
specifically worked in alleged
sections , the registers of those
departments with daily
activity report containing seal nos , packet
nos , bag nos , etc ?
52. are not their chances
of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent officers over
the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53. your expert is not
100% sure of seal mark , your records are not
there to prove the
presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged
sections , neither your
expert nor your records are 100% sure on what
date , at what stage , by
whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
54. is not the charge
sheet amounting to higher ups picking up
officers they dislike
& falsely implicating them ?
55. is it not cunning
ploy of higher ups to divert attention from
original criminals ?
56. why no action was
taken against currency officer of 1977-79
mr.J.Mitra ? why his
pension , super annuation benefits were not
withheld ?
57. what is your
justification , supporting evidence , records for
picking up only three
officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal
prosecution and leaving
the majority of probables ?
58. why you have dropped
charges against five asst treasurers ? why
you didn't even conduct
domestic enquiry against them , let alone
legal prosecution ?
59. Is it RBI's &
CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60. as inly 5% sampling
of verified note bundles are done , there are
more possibilities of
rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed
95% lot , isn't it ?
61. you have left out so
many officers who worked in those sections,
some of whom even became
management witnesses , instead of being
charge sheeted by the
management, is it fair play & legal ?
62. who are the bank
employees , from whom you have recovered the
alleged bank loss of Rs.220000
?
63. were all of them
charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed & their
pension , gratuity withheld ?
64. you don't have any
internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in
those departments , except a currency officer's
office note dated just on
the eve of charge sheet years after the
alleged crime ? does it
not prove that this note has been concocted
just to fix mr.G.Hariram
?
65. where as you have
records of other officials attendance in those
departments , but not
charge sheeted them why ?
66. three officers of
staff grade A daily work in three sections out
of 40 officers , why you
have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of
1095 working days , he
has worked for only 223 days in those
sections , still those
officers who worked for more days in those
sections are not charge
sheeted why ? the approver , the management
expert witness , shift
registers , V2 registers , Destruction
certificates , Form CD 55
, etc , nobody , no records were able to say
on what date , at what
stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on
what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not
futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher authorities to fix
innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67. the management expert
witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching /
Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint
custodians . they were not enquired & let off
why ?
68.
the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of
defaced note packets.
Where as the management expert witness say
substitution of defaced
notes only ? is not there difference between
loss of one number of
note & 100 number of notes ?
69.
as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not
count notes in each
bundles , but they just count the number of
bundles only. Is not
there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles
containing less number of
notes going unnoticed ? is it not the
failure of statuotary system
of work practices ?
70.
does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI
were hell bent to fix
mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original
criminals ?
Questions with respect to
other cases :
71.
how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as
directors of companies
which have availed bank loans ?
72.
how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks
have invested ?
73.
how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank
officials , who work in
shares investment / equity funds section ,
etc ?
74.
inspite of project reports by bank officials , over
assessment of collateral
securites / value of debtor companies by bank
officials , the loans
become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in
the market by selling off
the assets of debtor companies also. In such
cases , what action is
taken against erring bank officials who collude
with criminal
industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than
permissible ?
75.
give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.
76.
give names of industrial groups / promoters whose
companies have become
NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,
before investing in new
companies promoted by them.
77.
is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through
rowdies / recovery agents
, illegal ?
78.
why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for
aiding , abetting rowdism
, murdering people ?
79.
if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.
10000 from commoners is
right , what would you do to a promoter of a
debtor company to recover
loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?
but debtors of crores of
rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80.
what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer
by karim lala telgi who
printed fake stamp papers ?
81.
what action has been taken against those involved ?
82.
have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi
during narco analysis
test , if not why ? is it because they are
powerful & bigwigs ?
83.
how you are controlling the illegal finance activities ,
money lending by
individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?
84.
how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations ,
foreign donations by many
NGOs ?
85.
how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn
brokers , individuals you
have booked for illegal finance activities ?
Questions relating to RBI
CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86. who were responsible
for selling the good printing machine at
security press nasik to
scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87. who recruited
the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what criminal roles ?
88. how many
irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible
for installing, operating & supervising the
security set-up in R.B.I
?
90. how the raw
materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward
stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages,
scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are accounted for?
92. How the
finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps
physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of
all the above?
94. How the scrap
paper is disposed off ?
95. From security angle
who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96.
Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of stores assistant
in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?
97.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistant
at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?
98.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process
assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the
year 1996-1998 ?
99.
is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary
laws , fully funded by
public money ie from government exchequer ?
100. still
why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous
information request as
per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons
will come out of cubboard
?
101. what
action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI
Overseas branch for loss
of cheque / draft amounting to crores of
rupees ? if not why ?
102. give me
specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused
to the bank by loss of
cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is
containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing
huge losses to the banks
to the tune of crores of rupees ?
104. To my
previous rti requests and appeals you gave half truth information
to few questions and for most questions you didn't answer. Your denial of
information helped crime cover ups and aided criminals to
escape & commit more crimes unabated. Crime cover up and aid to crime
in itself is one more crime. Why should not you be together with RBI governor
legally prosecuted for the same.
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ #
LIG-2 No 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS
, LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL
,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA Cell
: 91 8970318202
WhatsApp 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in
https://dalit-online.blogspot.com
Contact : editor@dalitonline.in ,
No comments:
Post a Comment
About
Me
Powered by Blogger.
