Dalit-Online
Weekly e news paper
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.17....Issue. 03................17/01/2021
RTI
APPLICATION TO CPIO RESERVE BANK OF INDIA MUMBAI
Refer
RTI APPLICATION No:
RBIND/R/E/20/04870
HEREBY
, I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS
TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE
THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.
WITH
RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT
21
ST
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE
CHARGE
SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE
SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended
charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985
1.
Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid
of 1979 ?
2.
This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans
to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection
division working properly ?
3.
why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit
out
of premises ?
4.
why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value
of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
,
after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value
of notes issued for sorting ?
5.
Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the
employees of those sections ?
6.
why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents
relating to such high profile crime ?
7.
why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited
till 1983 ?
8.
Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections
for more period than accused officers ) from domestic
enquiry
?
9.
why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the
court ?
10.
is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested
interests
?
11.
did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing
charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent
investigation ?
12.
those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the
destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry
/ court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have
been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences
, aiding true criminals get away ?
13.
in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for
preserving old documents / records ?
14.
after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost
care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing
before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't ,
why
?
15.
does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with
the criminals ?
16.
RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of
individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of
defense
?
17.
RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry
are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another.
However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic
enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the
order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18.
The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed
in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
19.
didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate
evidences ?
20.
as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet
were missing , who is responsible for it ?
21.
has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers
- S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if
not why ?
22.
is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking
managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23.
what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent
higher officials ?
24.
whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line
of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of
law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal.
Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25.
as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any
loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct
of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram
came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension
?
26.
judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic
enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry
proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate
mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
27.
even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved
, before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank)
, previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But
in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous
sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28.
RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to
the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing
left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram
, why ?
29.
ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be
completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of
law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in
court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To
cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond
court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the
enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the
court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
30.
ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court
against
lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it
was not done , why ?
31.
did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period
?
32.
the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key
evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving
findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's
sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management.
What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI,
S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33.
why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
34.
did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram
, by including cancelled note vault in the charge
sheet
?
35.
does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings
/ facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards
fixed innocents from actual criminals ?
36.
is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of
bundled
verified defective note packets ?
37.
is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted
officers
illegal ?
38.
how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went
missing
?
39.
is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
40.
as per the statement of management witness / inspection head /
expert
mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed
from
packets made into new bundles , right ?
41.
as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst
treasurers
are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
42.
does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals ,
putting
some innocents seals over the notes ?
43.
does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification
section
?
44.
does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45.
why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
46.
why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979
?
47.
is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing
internal
inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court
proceedings
?
48.
your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged
, he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly
nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he
himself
is not 100% sure ?
49.
your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,
on
that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50.
your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud.
However
approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no
action
has been taken ?
51.
why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have
specifically
worked in alleged sections , the registers of those
departments
with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet
nos
, bag nos , etc ?
52.
are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent
officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53.
your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not
there
to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged
sections
, neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what
date
, at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
54.
is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up
officers
they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
55.
is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from
original
criminals ?
56.
why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79
mr.J.Mitra
? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not
withheld
?
57.
what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for
picking
up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal
prosecution
and leaving the majority of probables ?
58.
why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why
you
didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone
legal
prosecution ?
59.
Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60.
as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are
more
possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed
95%
lot , isn't it ?
61.
you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections,
some
of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being
charge
sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
62.
who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the
alleged
bank loss of Rs.220000 ?
63.
were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed
& their pension , gratuity withheld ?
64.
you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram
worked in those departments , except a currency officer's
office
note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the
alleged
crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted
just
to fix mr.G.Hariram ?
65.
where as you have records of other officials attendance in those
departments
, but not charge sheeted them why ?
66.
three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out
of
40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of
1095
working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those
sections
, still those officers who worked for more days in those
sections
are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management
expert
witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction
certificates
, Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say
on
what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were
unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram
? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher
authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67.
the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime
is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers
were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off
why
?
68.
the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution
of
defaced
note packets. Where as the management expert witness say
substitution
of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between
loss
of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
69.
as per the normal course of duty , staff officers
does not
count
notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of
bundles
only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles
containing
less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the
failure
of statuotary system of work practices ?
70.
does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI
& CBI
were
hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original
criminals
?
Questions
with respect to other cases :
71.
how do you monitor the work of bank officials
nominated as
directors
of companies which have availed bank loans ?
72.
how do you monitor the work of companies , in which
banks
have
invested ?
73.
how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of
certain bank
officials
, who work in shares investment / equity funds section ,
etc
?
74.
inspite of project reports by bank officials ,
over
assessment
of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank
officials
, the loans become NPAs & full value cann't be realized
in
the
market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such
cases
, what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude
with
criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than
permissible
?
75.
give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.
76.
give names of industrial groups / promoters
whose
companies
have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,
before
investing in new companies promoted by them.
77.
is not collection of loan from debtors of bank
through
rowdies
/ recovery agents , illegal ?
78.
why not criminal complaints filed against bank
mangers for
aiding
, abetting rowdism , murdering people ?
79.
if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans
of Rs.
10000
from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a
debtor
company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?
but
debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80.
what is the exact amount of loss caused to the
exchequer
by
karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?
81.
what action has been taken against those involved ?
82.
have you taken action against all those mentioned by
telgi
during
narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are
powerful
& bigwigs ?
83.
how you are controlling the illegal finance
activities ,
money
lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?
84.
how you are monitoring the receipt of public
donations ,
foreign
donations by many NGOs ?
85.
how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies ,
pawn
brokers
, individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?
Questions
relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86.
who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at
security
press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87.
who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what
criminal roles ?
88.
how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89.
who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the
security
set-up in R.B.I ?
90.
how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted
for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91.
how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are
accounted for?
92.
How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93.
Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of
all
the above?
94.
How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
95.
From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96.
Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for
the
post
of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?
97.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for
the
post
of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?
98.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for
the
post
of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the
year
1996-1998 ?
99.
is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by
statuotary
laws
, fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?
100.
still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous
information
request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons
will
come out of cubboard ?
101.
what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore &
SBI
Overseas
branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of
rupees
? if not why ?
102.
give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused
to
the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103.
how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing
huge
losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?
104.
To my previous rti requests and appeals you gave half truth
information to few questions and for most questions you didn't
answer. Your denial of information helped crime cover ups and aided
criminals to escape & commit more crimes unabated. Crime cover
up and aid to crime in itself is one more crime. Why should not you be together
with RBI governor legally prosecuted for the same.
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ #
LIG-2 No 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS
, LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL
,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA Cell
: 91 8970318202
WhatsApp 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in
https://dalit-online.blogspot.com
Contact : editor@dalitonline.in ,
editor.dalitonline@gmail.com
