Dalit-Online

Weekly e news paper

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.17....Issue. 10...............07/03/2021

Supreme Court Judges Worst violators of Human Rights

- An appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India

Read :

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com/2020/11/judges-bias-2.html?m=1 ,

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com/2020/11/judges-bias-1.html?m=1

Even a letter , post card from a person seeking justice for public at large should be treated as PIL in the interest of justice. Justice is more important than technicalities. However nowadays SCI in it's bid to cover up crimes cites various technicalities to reject the appeal.

The following appeal, PILs , RTI appeals are digitally signed by me. Hope duty consciousness will dawn on SCI Judges.

When a person is influential , well connected like Arnab Goswami bail is given by SCI in a matter of few hours but commoners has to languish in jail for years. If person happens to be influential industrialist like Adani case is taken up even during court vacation, if commoner he has to wait for years. If person happens to be super rich like Ambani crores of rupees dues will be deferred , instalment facility for years is extended if a commoner in same scenario doesn't pay dues court confiscates his personal property, defaulter is put behind bars. When influential persons land in trouble judges / police take suo motto action to rescue them, whereas when a commoner appeals , complains to police , supreme court specifically requesting for justice , protection to life no appropriate action taken. In each step of SCI judges there is bias in favor of rich / influential.

SCI Judges use “ CONTEMPT punishing powers “ as a weapon to silence persons seeking accountability of judges. There is also bias , double standards by SCI Judges just compare Advocate Nedumpara , Justice Karnan with Advocate Prashanth Bhushan. Second compare. AP Chief Minister Jagan Reddy with TV comedian Kunal Kamra.

Judges & Police lack professionalism. SHAME SHAME JUDGES & POLICE.

SHAME SHAME to family members of such corrupt judges & corrupt police, who enjoy luxurious lifestyle out of their spouse's ill gotten money.

Will apex court protect liberty for all citizens?

The administering of justice should never be selective, or so lacking in humanity that it revolts the human conscience.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the principle of personal liberty by granting interim bail to Republic TV’s chief Arnab Goswami in a 2018 case where he is accused of abetment of suicide. This is a good thing. There are some who do not like Goswami’s views, or the abusive felicity with which he name-calls and verbally humiliates his ideological “opponents” or demeans those whom he does not like. However, anyone’s personal likes and dislikes are not material to the protection of his or her constitutional rights. If his personal liberty has been unfairly violated, and he deserves to get bail, he should not be arbitrarily kept in prison by the law enforcement machinery of a state government with which he is at loggerheads.

It was heartening for citizens to hear the clarion call of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud: “If we as a constitutional court do not lay down the law and protect liberty, then who will?” The message was clear. The highest court in the land will intervene to protect personal liberty at any cost, list a case of this nature with lightning speed, overrule the standard judicial procedures like first pursuing a bail petition before the designated lower court, and hear the petition even if means working on the weekend. This is also a good thing.

However, such heartening news may not have bought much hope to Father Stan Swamy, who is languishing in Taloja jail in Navi Mumbai. The 83-year-old tribal rights activist has been incarcerated since January 2018 for his alleged Maoist links in the Elgar Parishad case. On November 6 this year, Swamy moved a petition before the National Investigation Agency special court in which he asked for a straw or a sipper cup in jail. “I cannot hold a glass as my hands are unsteady due to Parkinson’s (disease)”, his petition said. He was asking not for big things like personal liberty and freedom. His only request was for a sipper cup or a paper straw so that he could drink water without spilling. A straw or a sipper are not dangerous items, nor are they luxury items which prisoners should not have. But that request does symbolise some things as important as personal liberty, which the Supreme Court so vigilantly defended. It symbolises a human being’s legitimate craving for dignity; of his supplication for compassion; of his expectation of humane treatment; of his hope in a caring system for those in deep medical distress. The special court judge who heard this desperate petition simply asked the NIA to file its reply on the matter on November 26.

For 20 days Father Stan Swamy will continue to wait with his trembling hands for a straw or a sipper to be provided to him. The NIA will get twenty days to consider whether such a request should be conceded to. And there is no guarantee that when it does file its reply on November 26, it would accede to the request. The legal position in the matter may require further deliberation. The rules need to be checked out for “dangerous” prisoners. If these don’t provide for a straw to be given to prisoners, how can an exception be made? After all a sipper, that would enable an 83-year-old prisoner suffering from advanced Parkinson’s disease to take a sip of water, could sabotage the interests of the state.

Perhaps the honourable Supreme Court could take suo motu cognisance of such matters as well. Travesty of justice has many forms. In some cases, the rule book is thrown at those deprived of personal liberty, who languish in prison for months without bail. In others, matters are fast tracked at incredible speed, and the judiciary makes public its unwavering commitment to protect personal liberty. Perhaps, the highest court of the land will also then take steps to ensure that the personal liberty of people like the octogenarian Varavara Rao, who has been repeatedly denied bail, and not given permission to be admitted to hospital. The 80-year-old poet, teacher and activist, who has been in jail without trial since 2018, again for alleged Maoist links in the Elgar Parishad case, “was found lying on a soiled bed soaked in urine with no one to attend to him”. His health is extremely precarious; he has suffered deliriums in jail, where he also contracted the Covid-19 virus. Perhaps the Supreme Court may also ask its judicial subordinates why bail in the case of a pregnant Safoora Zargar, arrested for participating in the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, took as much as 70 days to be processed.

The nation looks upon the Supreme Court, and the judiciary in general, as an agency of the last resort to get justice. When the Supreme Court declares that it will intervene proactively to ensure personal liberty, it raises, in the thousands of prisoners who are for untenable and inhumane reasons being denied personal liberty, the possibility of hope. Surely, the Government of India is not so vulnerable that it treats people above the age of 80 who are nearly disabled, as “enemies” who can destabilise the State. The administering of justice should never be selective, or so lacking in humanity that it revolts the human conscience. When Father Stan Swamy is given the freedom to drink water with a semblance of dignity, we will believe that the Supreme Court’s concern for Arnab Goswami has a larger meaning and a message for the conduct of the judiciary as a whole.

PIL – Fundamental Duties of Citizens Vs Corrupt Government Officials

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2021

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor , DALIT ONLINE & DECCAN INQUIRER ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Fundamental Duties of Citizens and Constitutional Duties of Public Servants are complementary to each other. Nowadays criminalization of politics , judiciary , police , etc has taken place and many unfit candidates are in public service. These corrupt , unfit public servants are misusing their offices and putting legal seal on illegal acts , making those illegal acts technically legal. Here raises the conflict between FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF AN INDIAN CITIZEN and ILLEGAL ACTS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

For example real estate mafia grabs BEML Quarters lake , Kaynes Hootagalli Lake , Ningaih lake , Hebbal lakes in mysuru creates fake title deeds and even gets it registered by sub registrar all with the help corrupt officials in government. Even police protect the rich land grabber. When a case is made out in the court of law for eviction of lake encroachers , judge simply goes through the technicalities of government documents. Based on official documents he gives a green signal to encroacher and orders for protection of his encroached properties. Lakes are nobody’s property , it is a public property and to be preserved for public usage. The good Samaritan Indian Citizen who did his “Fundamental Duties of Protecting Lakes “ lost money , time, faced abuses / remarks from the judge , faced life threat from land mafia & police. All for nothing.

One more example , a citizen while passing through a public road witnesses an accident , takes the injured to the hospital for emergency treatment to save life and informs police regarding accident making vehicle. Instead of appreciating his good work , police fits him in the case , case drags on for years making the good citizen loose his money , time & job. Also , he is threatened by vehicle owner who made the accident , no protection to the citizen for doing his :Fundamental Duties”.

One more example , a citizen complained to authorities regarding business of a liquor bar in a residential location much close to religious building & schools. The bar owner had secured license from state excise department much against the norms. Police called the good citizen for questioning repeatedly , court judge called him to court repeatedly and finally based on the license given by corrupt government official allowed the bar to operate , fined the complainant. Goons of bar owner roughed up the good citizen making him to move away from the locality itself.

An Indian citizen requests for information from authorities regarding llegalities , irregularities , misuse of office in working by judges , police , etc from supreme court of india and other related authorities under RTI Act. So that based on RTI reply from concerned authorities he can legally prosecute the guilty judges , police , public servants , can get the injustices rectified by court of law and put an end to further crimes by those guilty , corrupt public servants all in public interest. This is an effort by that Indian citizen as his “FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES” to uphold law , constitution of india. But PIOs , RTI Appellate authorities of supreme court of india & other bodies didn’t give full truthful information at all . Thereby , they committed one more crime of of covering up another crime and aiding criminals to continue with their crimes unabated. Thereby , guilty judges , police , other public servants obstructed the citizen from performing his FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES , Violated his FUNNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS TO EQUITABLE JUSTICE. No justice in sight till date to good Samaritan Indian citizen , more injustices were meted out to him by judges , police , public servants - he suffered physical assaults , murder attempts , jobs denied , news paper closed , press accreditation denied , PILS he sent to apex court were not admitted , all to silence him.

In this way , there are numerous cases of Indian Citizens , whistle blowers , RTI Activists , Journalists who themselves suffered gross injustices for raising public causes , for doing their Fundamental Duties. No Justice to them even from apex court till date.

Every citizen of india must perform his / her “Fundamental Duties” without fail, before demanding his fundamental rights. Every public servant must do their constitutional duties without fail.

A citizen performs fundamental duties without any rewards or pay or perks where as a government official / public servant does his / her duties for huge pay & perks.

A citizen while performing his fundamental duties often has to spend his own money , time to fight legal cases , etc. Whereas a public servant spends nothing during the course of his public duties, everything is borne by state exchequer.

A citizen while performing his fundamental duties faces rowdy elements , physical assaults in few instances even resulting in his own murder. His family doesn’t get even a penny compensation from exchequer. Whereas a public servant enjoys the full police protection in the course of his duties and even if anything untoward happens his family will get compensation.

Obstructing a Citizen from performing his fundamental duties doesn’t attract any legal prosecution whereas obstruction of public servant’s constitutional duties is a crime under IPC.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are Fundamental Duties of Indian Citizens Supreme or the Illegal acts , orders by corrupt Government officials (Legalizing illegal acts) Supreme ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt judges , police , public servants responsible for injustices , obstructions to Fundamental Duties of citizens.

4. Averment:

Please read details at :

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

SHAME SHAME JUDGEs - Atrocities against DALITs by Judges

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-judges ,

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/shame-shame-judges

“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”

- Mahatma Gandhi

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases mentioned at above web sites , to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

1. To make obstruction of “Fundamental Duties of an Indian Citizen” a legally punishable offence on par with the obstruction of a public servant’s duties.

2. To pay compensation of Rupees Two Crores and above to RTI Activists , Whistle Blowers , Journalists , ordinary citizens who paid with their lives or suffered injuries in the course of their fundamental duties.

3. To order for inspection , investigation of each & every issue raised by a citizen in the course of his fundamental duties instead of simply relying on government records alone prepared by corrupt officials.

4. To order all public servants including judges , Members of Parliament , Members of Legislative Assemblies , IAS officers , other public servants to do their constitutional duties as well as their FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES properly.

5. To admit all the PILs sent by me to supreme court of india and to order the concerned public servants to give proper reply to all RTI Appeals made by me.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 07.03.2021……… ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

RTI APPLICATION TO CPIO DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION , GOI NEW DELHI

Refer RTI APPLICATION No :

DGTHQ/R/E/20/00104

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.

M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd again renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC International , Mysore used to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables and supplied it to department of telecommunications , government of india , Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to pay hundreds of crores of rupees from public exchequer to buy these cables . There is also one more company by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd , Mysore belonging to the same industrial group supplying PIJF & OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a tax payer I want to know whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well spent.

1. How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT , Supreme Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?

2. What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above companies , casewise ?

3. How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were rejected by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?

4. Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make good all the losses , yearwise ?

5. If not , why ?

6. What action taken by DOT , casewise ?

7. How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were accepted on deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?

8. Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the manufacture of cables ?

9. If yes , on what basis ?

10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by above companies to third parties , casewise ?

11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies have failed during usage within the warranty period , yearwise ?

12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?

13. If not why , casewise ?

14. What action by DOT , casewise ?

15. Did KTL / RPG TELECOM / RPG CABLES violate norms laid down by DOT / BSNL , etc ?

16. RPG cables taking orders for cables from government but getting it manufactured in Concepta cables and vice versa, is it legal ? What action by DOT , BSNL , MTNL ,etc ?

16. To my previous rti requests and appeals you gave half truth information to few questions and for most questions you didn't answer. Your denial of information helped crime cover ups and aided criminals to escape & commit more crimes unabated. Crime cover up and aid to crime in itself is one more crime. Why should not you be together with Secretary DOT legally prosecuted for the same.

17. Give me the list of legal actions taken by DOT against Reliance Infocom and Reliance Jio for recovery of public money viz failure to pay switching fees , loss of money due to getting license for data only paying lowest money but getting freebies of voice / telecom service at the cost of data only , rerouting of international calls as local calls , for failure to pay charges for using telecom infrastructure of DOT , BSNL, MTNL.

18. Is license issued to Reliance infocom and Reliance Jio legal ?

19. BSNL, private players like jio levy penalty , interest on post paid telephone subscribers when they make delayed bill payments. After certain period service line itself will be ruthlessly cut. When this is the ground reality why Jio and other private telecom players are given twenty years period by supreme court in addition to discounted rate. Has the DOT submitted an appeal in the Supreme Court of India for the review of it's order ( by Justice Arun Mishra ) regarding AGR dues ?

20. Why not yet DOT stopped providing telecom infrastructure service to defaulting private telecom companies ?

21. Is it not loss to public exchequer ? Beneficiaries ?

PIL - Telecables Scam

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2021

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor DALIT ONLINE & DECCAN INQUIRER

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Cabinet Secretary ( Telecommunications) Government of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for

power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

2. Eventhough , certain PIJF companies were previously found to be involved in illegal practices , CPIO of DOT / BSNL is hiding information . Thereby , he is trying to shield criminals.

3. By this action CPIO of DOT / BSNL is aiding criminals.

2. Question(s) of Law:

DOT / BSNL has paid crores of rupees to PIJF Telecable manufacturers towards purchase of cables. The money is from public exchequer , people’s money . That public money is swindled by cable manufacturers with tacit support of DOT / BSNL officials. Why no prosecution of DOT / BSNL officials & cable manufacturers ? are they above law ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , Accountability for public money worth crores of rupees.

4. Averment:

Private companies in their greed for money are violating norms in league with public officials. They have caused loss to the public exchequer.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :

CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED

http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218 ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---telecable-scam

Dated : 07.03.2021……………………………………….. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India………………………….. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

RTI request to Honourable Chief Justice of India and Honourable Chairman National Human Rights Commission New Delhi

Refer RTI applications no : JUSTC/R/E/20/01830 and

NHRCM/R/E/20/00513

Honourable Sir,

First of all our salutes, whole hearted respects to honest few in police , judiciary and public service. It is an appeal to those honest few to catch hold of their corrupt colleagues. Both of you take lakhs of rupees salary, enjoy 5 star bungalow, flight travel , perks , etc all at tax payer's expense , still don't do your constitutional duties properly. SCI doesn't even admit our PILs concerning national security , accountability of public servants , etc although I have suffered murder attempts, physical assaults, job loss , etc in my crusade. But SCI has got enough time to hear cases of cricket , movies. Whether NHRC consists of humans or not needs a clarification. They lack humanness, empathy. To my RTI requests SCI cites various sections of law just like criminals, thieves to evade truth. NHRC too cites various sections of law to evade truth , to evade taking legal action. It is Crime cover up, which is one more crime by them. Both of them must first read the third grade acts of police , judges at below articles and following web sites :

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2020/04/rogue-police-judges.html?m=1 ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/third-degree-torture-to-corrupt-police-judges ,

In fact, following the landmark 1997 DK Basu vs West Bengal case, the Supreme Court laid down some basic guidelines to prevent custodial abuse which have been absorbed into the Code of Criminal Procedure.

These directions have to be followed by the police. Refusal to do would result in contempt of court.

Both of you please give me information regarding following :

1. List of legal action taken by SCI & NHRC against guilty police , judges involved in crimes against humanity , 3rd degree torture by police case wise since last 20 years.

2. List of legal action taken by SCI & NHRC against guilty police , judges involved in crimes against humanity , 3rd degree torture by police with regards to cases mentioned in above web sites.

3. Legal steps taken by SCI & NHRC to prevent recurrence of 3rd degree torture by police , remand judge failing to protect health , safety of accused and government doctor failing to record actual health status of accused. List of actions taken by SCI & NHRC against such guilty judges and government doctors who aided guilty police in covering up 3rd degree torture by police on suspects.

4. List of Police who were booked on murder charges for inflicting 3rd degree torture on suspects.

5. List of police who were prosecuted for contempt of SCI with regards to violation of SCI guidelines on arrest procedure and illegal 3rd degree torture by police.

6. List of actions taken by SCI and NHRC against police involved in torture , lathi charge of farmers, farmer's family members during MAHADAYI RIVER PROTEST in karnataka.

7. List of actions taken by SCI and NHRC against police involved in torture of tribals in MALE MAHADESHWARA HILLS karnataka during Operation catch forest brigand Veerappan.

8. List of actions taken by SCI and NHRC against police involved in torture of tribals based on NHRC fact finding committee and Justice A J Sadashiva findings.

If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable Chairman NHRC together with jurisdiction police and district magistrate will be responsible for it.

Date : 07.03.2021 Thank you,

Place : Mysuru Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

PIL – 3rd Degree Torture for Corrupt Police Corrupt Judges

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India , Karnataka High Court & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2021

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor DALIT ONLINE

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Union Home Secretary , GOI

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Only in a free & fair atmoshphere without undue influence or pressure , a person can tell truth. Recently in many high profile cases like Sohrabuddin fake encounter case witnesses are turning hostile , but courts are not taking action against the responsible police. In few other cases , police use 3rd degree torture methods on suspects to fit them in the cases. Even when the accused appeals to judge for his protection from 3rd degree torture by police , judge still remands him to police custody. Example Gauri Lankesh case.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Is it not the duty of presiding judge of a case to ensure safety of defendant , accused , complainant & witnesses ? When police or others use 3rd degree torture on accused , witnesses , etc are NOT such Police & Judge Punishable ?

If Judges , Police , Advocates have accepted 3rd degree torture as a right method to elicit truth from suspects, ok. When police subject an accused / a commoner to 3rd degree torture about a crime / theft of hundred rupees , why not police who have robbed crores of rupees ( dacoity by police near yelwal mysuru ) are subjected to 3rd degree torture by their colleagues? why not police torture former DGP for his involvement in lottery scam ? Why not police torture their colleagues who have links , pass information to Dawood Ibrahim ? Why not police torture Present CJI Dipak Mishra to elicit truth about fake affidavit , kalikho pul case , Prasad education trust ? Why not police torture Karnataka high court judges involved in mysore roost resort sex scandal ? All for eliciting truth. Why NOT ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , equal treatment of prisoners. Requests of stopping torture of poor prisoners. Prosecution of corrupt judges , police & jail personnel.

4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases to perform their duties.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , GOI , Government of Karnataka authorities in the case to perform their duties.

b. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to immediately annul the Jail Manuals of all state governments of india , which are discriminatory.

c. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to constitute an expert committee to frame a “ Model Jail Manual “ applicable to all Indian states , union territories.

d. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to initiate legal prosecution of jail personnel , police & judges who failed in their duties to ensure safety of prisoners , resulting in torture of prisoners and for prolonged imprisonment or illegal imprisonment of innocents.

e. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to order all state governments to ensure food , health care , recreational facilities , parole on an equal footing to all prisoners without discrimination.

f. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to order respective state governments pay compensation to prisoners for suffering discrimination , torture.

g. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to order respective state governments pay compensation to prisoners who spent years behind bars , finally acquitted by courts and in the case of prisoners who spent more years in jail than the quantum of punishment codified in IPC due to prolonged case trials. In both such cases afterwards state government must recover money from respective presiding judges , investigation officer & government legal prosecutor.

h. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to order Government of Karnataka to provide protection to all the accused in Gauri Lankesh Case and to legally prosecute the guilty police officials for attempt to murder charges. Also to legally prosecute the presiding judge of the case who failed to do his duty in protecting the accused.

i. In Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case hostile witnesses have crossed 50 numbers. Either now they are under police threat, pressure &are lying orelse years back they were under police threat , pressure and lied previously. Either the present police are guilty or the previous ones. Therefore honourable court must first prosecute responsible police for criminal charges of covering up crime, cheating & misleading the court , contempt of court. Also the advocates of case at that time who together with guilty police mislead the court must also be prosecuted for the same criminal charges. Above all the judge who failed to protect witnesses from police threat must be prosecuted. Otherwise it is no justice , only power of ruling elite who always wins.

j. to order state police , central intelligence to subject the police officials , judges also to 3rd degree torture methods when they face allegations of corruption , illegalities , to elicit truth just as in the case of commoners. FAIR JUSTICE.

k. to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 07.03.2021…………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

PIL – Compensate Prisoners illegally detained

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India , Karnataka High Court & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2021

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor DALIT ONLINE & DECCAN INQUIRER

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Majority of prisoners in Indian jails belong to poor , minority , oppressed sections of society and 2/3rd of prison population comprises of undertrials. Are not there any criminals among rich , affluent and forward castes , majority community ? It proves the bias , prejudice of police , establishment. There are good , honest people as well as criminals in all castes , religions and all walks of life. There are deadly anti nationals , criminals among the police force , judiciary , parliament , but due to their caste , financial clout escaping from conviction , legal prosecution.

As per law , all citizens of india are equal. However under trials ( who are innocents till proven guilty ) are discriminated in Indian jails. Ordinary citizens / accused are crammed in rooms resembling pig stays . whereas accused from rich / influential back grounds are given separate rooms with cot , bed , television , news paper , etc.

As per law , all citizens of india are equal. A criminal is a criminal . However Indian prison authorities discriminates here also. Former ministers who looted crores of rupees from public exchequer , corporate persons industrialists who have cheated public , public banks of crores of rupees are given royal treatment , get best food , health care where as an ordinary pick pocket , house burglar are treated like slaves , pigs don’t get proper food , health care.

India Jail Manual procedures differentiate prisoners based on their caste , social background , while allotting prison cells , food , visitor facility , parole , mandatory work , recreation facilities - which in itself is illegal.

Apart from this , corruption in Indian jails is rampant. Prisoners with money , influence get everything within jail itself , mobile phone , drugs , fire arms , etc. some mafia dons run their empire from prison itself.

Poor prisoners are tortured by police , jail personnel and criminals within jails. Indian Jails are reform centre , where everyone should treated equally in all respects. By practicing discrimination jail authorities are promoting small time criminals to commit bigger crimes to get royal treatment in society as well as in jail.

Few prisoners convicted by lower court due to bias of police , prosecutor & lower court judges are acquitted by higher courts. However due to this wrong conviction of innocents , the innocent person is deprived of his life & liberty for years , decades. But the culprits Investigating officer , police , public prosecutor & judge are not prosecuted for their crimes. In this manner even innocents are killed in fake encounters or by death sentence.

It is the duty of the judge who awards jail sentence to a convict or an accused , to ensure his safety , health care and to see that prisoner gets right punishment as per law. Here our judges have failed. SHAME SHAME to police & judges.

If the Supreme Court of India , NHRC delays in acting on this PIL petition resulting in prolonged imprisonment of undertrials , convicts or Innocents , Supreme Court of India / NHRC judges also jointly become responsible for the crimes against those illegally imprisoned and SCI judges are also equally responsible to pay compensation from their personal pockets.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are not all prisoners equal ? is not theft of ten rupees or theft of thousand crores of rupees , both crimes ? Are not both criminals thieves ? then why differentiation ? Is it not the constitutional duty of a judge who has awarded jail sentence to an accused / a convict , to ensure safety , health care of the said prosiner ? is it not the duty of the judge to monitor whether the convict is getting right punishment as per law nothing less nothing more ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , equal treatment of prisoners. Requests of stopping torture of poor prisoners. Prosecution of corrupt judges , police & jail personnel.

4. Averment:

Prosecute Sanjay Dutt under TADA

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/prosecute-sanjay-dutt-under-tada

Revoke Bail of Salman Khan

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/revoke-bail-of-salman-khan ,

Aeroplane Rides for Corrupt Police Corrupt Judges

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/aeroplane-rides-for-corrupt-police-corrupt-judges ,

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki

FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , Government of Karnataka authorities in the case to perform their duties.

b. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to immediately annul the Jail Manuals of all state governments of india , which are discriminatory.

c. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to constitute an expert committee to frame a “ Model Jail Manual “ applicable to all Indian states , union territories.

f. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to order respective state governments pay compensation to prisoners for suffering discrimination , torture.

h . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 07.03.2021 …………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

RTI Appeal to Honourable Delhi Police Commissioner

- Delhi Police Cover up Crimes by Judges

Refer : DEPOL/R/E/20/00429

Honourable sir ,

To my previous requests , you have not given information requested and gave elusive replies, information just like criminals do during police interrogation. Your denial of information amounts to crime cover ups making yourselves criminals. Please give me information about following under RTI Act :

1. Details of action taken against SCI judges Ranjan Gogoi, swatantra kumar , Ganguly , Judges involved in roost resort sex scandal on charges of sexual harassment against women. If not reasons for it. Please give me FIR number of each case.

2. List of public servants present and past MPs , IAS & IPS officers, etc with citizenship of foreign countries in addition to indian citizenship. Also give me list of public servants with spouses of foreign origin.

3. Details of action taken against SCI judge deepak mishra in medical college case , kalikho pul death statement. President of India Pranab mukherjee was also accused by kalikho pul. If not reasons for it.

4. Details of our present MPs , IAS & IPS officers facing criminal charges .

5. Details of action taken regarding charges made by CBI director Alok verma against his deputy Rakesh Asthana and vice versa. If not reasons for it.

6. Details of action taken against police who are aiding underworld don dawood ibrahim. If not reasons for it.

7. Details of action taken against reliance industries in relation to document leak in power , petroleum , coal ministries. If not reasons for it.

8. Details of action taken against journalists, lobbyists involved in Radia tape. If not reasons for it.

9. Does Smt.Sonia Gandhi & Shri.Rahul Gandhi have citizenship of foreign countries in addition to indian citizenship. Details please.

10. Does delhi police use third degree torture against detainees.

11. Details of action taken against public servants , ministers who aided terrorism at the expense of public exchequer. If not reasons for it.

Please read documents at following web pages and answer :

https://www.scribd.com/document/402134326/INTERROGATE-Judges-Police ,

https://www.scribd.com/document/399783839/India-Sponsored-Terrorists , https://www.scribd.com/document/412164943/CJI-in-Jail ,

Thank you

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Judge's Collusion with Bellary Mining Mafia ?

In spite of investigation and reports by CBI & Karnataka Lokayukta , no clear conviction of karnataka government officials involved in Bellary Mining scandal has been taken. Supreme Court of India is also silent since years despite appeals for justice in this matter. The corrupt officials are continuing in government service and few of them even got promotions , plum postings for their yeoman ( ? ) service.

SCI judges have ample time to play golf , tour abroad , take millions of salary all at tax payer's expense. Judges have ample time to decide cases relating to movies , sports but not for cases of national importance.

This attitude of Judge's and SCI points towards complicity of judiciary in “ Bellary Mining Case cover up".

A shame on SCI Judges. If at all SCI Judges are sincere enough, let them take appropriate action as they do against commoners. Judges & Police exhibit their full force against commoners , roar on them but before mining barons just whimper.

Your's Sincerely

NAGARAJA MYSURU RAGHUPATHI

PIL – Legal Prosecution of officials involved in Bellary Mining Scam

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2021

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R ,

editor , DALIT ONLINE & DECCAN INQUIRER ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF

MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.

A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

B . Loot of natural resources in Karnataka state and illegal aid to those criminals by government officials. Read Karnataka Lokayukta Mining scam report .

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are forest officials , police & revenue officials who aided bellary mining loot , above Law & can go scot free ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution & punishment of guilty police , revenue , forest officials.

4. Averment:

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS MENTIONED IN THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPORT submitted by Justice Santosh Hegde & Shri.U.V.Singh ABOUT BELLARY MINING SCAM. IF NOT WHY ? REASONS THEROF.

How many guilty government officials mentioned in the above report got promotions , continuing in service making it easy for them to tamper evidences ?

What action against public servants , officials who are hushing up the case & protecting the guilty ?

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees.

That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to legally prosecute guilty officials mentioned in the above said report.

(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect natural resources and to protect the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.

(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to immediately keep all government officials mentioned in the above said report under suspension from service & to take necessary steps to protect all type of evidences.

(v) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 07.03.2021………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru India……………………………………Petitioner in person

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA Cell : 91 8970318202

WhatsApp 91 8970318202

Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com

Contact : editor@dalitonline.in ,

editor.dalitonline@gmail.com

Dalit-Online

Sunday, March 7, 2021

Judges Worst Violators of Human Rights

Dalit-Online