Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Answer Honourable Home Minister

 Dalit-Online  

Weekly e news paper  

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.17....Issue. 35...........29/08/2021 

  

 

 

RTI Questions to  Honourable  Union Home Minister and Union Home Secretary GOI 

 

RTI Application  ref : MHOME/R/E/20/02905 

 

Police Torture Chambers :  

 

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2019/07/torture-chambers.html?m=1  

 

Main A : 

 

1.how many CBI officials ,  state police officials are facing charges of corruption , 3rd degree torture , lock-up/encounter deaths 

, rapes , fake cases , etc ? 

 

2.how you are monitoring the ever increasing wealth of corrupt police officials? 

 

3.how many officials from the ranks of constable to DGP have amassed illegal wealth? 

 

4.what action you have taken in these cases ? have you got reinvestigated all the cases handled by tainted police? 

 

5.how many policemen have been awarded death penalty & hanged till death , for cold blooded murders in the form of lock-up deaths / encounter deaths ? 

 

6.why DGP of Karnataka is not registering my complaint dt 10/12/2004 , subsequent police complaints ? is it because rich & mighty are involved ? 

 

7.e - voice is ready to bring to book corrupt police officials subject to conditions, are you ready ? 

 

8.how many police personnel are charged with violations of people's human rights & fundamental rights ? 

 

9.how many STF police deployed to nab veerappan were themselves charged with theft of forest wealth? 

 

10.how you are ensuring the safety , health , food , living space of inmates in jails? 

 

11.how you are ensuring the medical care , health of prisoners in hospitals & mental asylums? 

 

12.How you are ensuring the safety , health , food , living space of inmates in juvenile homes ? 

 

Main B : 

. Why was Judge JT Utpat, Judge Loya’s predecessor in hearing the case, transferred from hearing the case despite a 2012 Supreme Court order specifying that the same judge should hear the matter from start to finish? 

2. Were Bombay High Court Chief Justice Mohit Shah or the principal accused Amit Shah aware of any alleged inducements offered to Judge Loya to ensure a favourable judgment in the case? 

3. Does Justice Mohit Shah deny the allegation by Judge Loya’s sister Anuradha Biyani, that he himself made an offer of Rs 100 crore in return for a favourable judgment? 

4. Who made the arrangements for Judge Loya’s transportation to Dande Hospital on the night of his death, and why was this not in a vehicle from the government guest house or an ambulance? 

5. Do Dande Hospital and/or Meditrina Hospital have records indicating what medication was provided to Judge Loya while in their care, and who was with him at the time? 

6. What was the time of Judge Loya’s death according to the records of Meditrina Hospital and when do call records show this was intimated to Judge Loya’s family? Did the death occur at 6:15 am or before 5 am on 1 December 2014, or did it in fact occur before midnight? 

7. In what circumstances can a person die of “coronary artery insufficiency”? Is it possible for a person in good physical health without any cardiac history or other markers of this condition, experience “coronary artery insufficiency” and lose their life 

8. Why was a post-mortem report ordered into Judge Loya’s death when no panchnama or FIR was filed terming it a suspicious death, and why was Judge Loya’s family not informed about the performance of a post-mortem? Alternatively, were any reasons for performance of post-mortem report recorded, where were these recorded and who recorded them? 

9. Who signed the post-mortem report pages as “maiyatacha chulatbhau” (ie paternal cousin brother of the deceased) when no relation of Judge Loya was present in Nagpur? Does the countersignatory, the senior police inspector of Sadar police station, recollect who this was? 

10. What was Ishwar Baheti’s relationship with the deceased and on what basis was he coordinating the funeral arrangements for Judge Loya, including contacting the family? Why was Judge Loya’s phone returned to the family by Mr Baheti rather than the police? Alternatively, did the police ask Mr Baheti to return the phone to Judge Loya’s family? 

11. Does Judge Loya’s family still have the allegedly bloodstained shirt worn by Judge Loya at the time of death which the post-mortem report claims was dry? 

12. Is it true that the CBI was only given 15 minutes to argue against the discharge of Amit Shah in subsequent hearings of the case before Judge Loya’s successor in hearing the case, Judge Gosavi, as against three days for the defence lawyers? 

13. Who made the decision to announce MS Dhoni’s retirement from test cricket on 30 December 2014? Was this decided by the player or the BCCI and did any external source suggest the specific date? 

14. Sohrabuddin/Tulsirram Prajapati fake encounter case was transferred from Gujarat to CBI court, Mumbai by the Supreme Court in the year 2012, directing that same judge will preside over the trial from start to finish. Judge Utpat was designated as special CBI Judge in Mumbai. He allegedly reprimanded the accused for not appearing in his court and fixed the case for June 26, 2014. A day before, on June 25, 2014, he was abruptly transferred. Judge B.H. Loya was posted in his place. Judge Loya died in suspicious circumstances on November 30, 2014. Post that, shri Amit Shah has been since discharged and CBI refused to file an appeal against the order of the discharge. 

15. Sister of Judge Loya gave an interview to a media house on November 21, 2017, to allege that he was being offered a Rs 100-crore bribe plus residential flat/property in Mumbai for delivering a verdict in favour of the accused by a former chief justice. 

16. Judge Loya was stated to have died on account of heart attack. ECG and histopathology report of 

Judge Loya showed no evidence of heart attack. On the contrary, Dr R.K. Sharma, ex-head of Forensics & Toxicology at AIIMS stated that there was no evidence of heart attack and there was evidence of ‘possible trauma to the brain’. 

17. Judge Loya’s security was withdrawn on November 24, 2014 in Mumbai and he was not provided any security as he travelled from Mumbai to Nagpur, where he died on November 30, 2014. 

18. There is no travel record of Judge Loya travelling by train from Mumbai to Nagpur. 

19. There is no entry or record of Judge Loya having stayed in the occupancy register of Ravi Bhavan, Nagpur on November 30, 2014. Fifteen employees posted in Ravi Bhavan, Nagpur did not even recall that Judge Loya ever stayed in Ravi Bhavan. 

20. There was no reason for three judges to sleep in a room with only two beds when adjoining rooms were empty. Why did the 15 members of the staff then not know either about the stay or the heart attack? Why were no entries made in the occupancy register? 

21. Family of Judge Loya has publicaly stated that clothes on his dead body had blood stains, especially near the neck area. 

22. Post-mortem of Judge Loya was conducted on December 1, 2014 without information and consent of any immediate family members. There were discrepancies even in recording of Judge Loya’s name in post-mortem report. 

23. Two of the other colleagues of Judge Loya, who were allegedly informed about the pressure being put on him, also died under suspicious circumstances. One associate, advocate Khandalkar’s body was found in district court, Nagpur after alleged fall from the eighth story on November 29, 2015. 

(November 28, 2015 was closed court work and he was missing for two days). Second associate, retired 

Judge Thombre died in suspicious circumstances while travelling in train from Nagpur to Bangalore on May 16, 2016. There is no FIR or an investigation in these deaths till date. One advocate Satish Uke, raising the issue narrowly escaped death when on July 8, 2016, heavy weight iron material of 5,000 kgs fell on his office. 

 

24. What  action taken  against witnesses   in sohrabuddin fake encounter case , ishrath jahan  & tulsi ram prajapati fake encounter cases , haren pandya murder case  who  turned hostile after  years  ? 

25. What  action taken  against   police officials   in sohrabuddin fake encounter case , ishrath jahan  & tulsi ram prajapati fake encounter cases , haren pandya murder case  who  turned hostile changed prosecution  after  years  and at the end  preferred not to appeal in higher court  ? 

 

Main C : 

 

1. Details of action taken against SCI judges  Ranjan Gogoi,  swatantra kumar , Ganguly , Judges involved  in  roost resort sex scandal on charges of sexual  harassment against women. If not reasons for it. Please give me FIR number of each case. 

2. List of  public servants  present and past  MPs , IAS & IPS officers, etc   with citizenship of foreign countries in addition to indian citizenship. Also give me list of public servants with spouses of foreign origin. 

3. Details of action taken against SCI judge deepak mishra in medical college case , kalikho pul death statement. President of India  Pranab mukherjee was also accused by kalikho  pul. If not reasons for it. 

4. Details of our present MPs , IAS & IPS officers facing criminal  charges . 

5. Details of  action  taken regarding  charges made by CBI director Alok verma against his deputy Rakesh Asthana and vice versa. If not reasons for it. 

6. Details of action taken against police who are aiding underworld don dawood ibrahim. If not reasons for it. 

7. Details of action taken against reliance industries in relation to document leak in power , petroleum , coal  ministries. If not reasons for it. 

8. Details of action taken against journalists,  lobbyists involved in Radia tape. If not reasons for it. 

9. Does Smt.Sonia Gandhi & Shri.Rahul Gandhi have citizenship of foreign countries in addition to indian citizenship. Details please. 

10. Does  delhi police use third degree torture against detainees. 

11. Details of action taken against  public servants , ministers who aided terrorism at the expense of public exchequer. If not  reasons for it. 

 

Please read documents at following web pages and answer : 

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/402134326/INTERROGATE-Judges-Police , https://www.scribd.com/document/399783839/India-Sponsored-Terrorists , https://www.scribd.com/document/412164943/CJI-in-Jail  

 

 

RTI - Answer  Honourable  CJI  SCI & Chairman  NHRC 

 

Refer  RTI  request nos : 

JUSTC/R/2019/52664 

NHRCM/R/2019/50678 

 

 

Since 1990 , I as a citizen of India have brought to notice of SCI various crimes  hoping for justice to the  suffering public. Supreme court of India has enough time to judge trivial issues concerning movies , cricket , etc  but it doesn’t  have time to judge public  issues concerning national security , accountability of judges , police , public servants  in all these 28 years.  After repeatedly appealing for justice , powers that be have meted out injustices to me personally to silence me. SCI has failed in it’s duties  since 28 years , but judges are taking  hefty pay , perks from our money , public money  without feeling of shame or guilt. 

 

Hereby , I request Honourable CJI , SCI to  provide information  by answering  following questions : 

 

1. Since 1990 how many applications of PIL , RTI are received by SCI from me  NAGARAJA M R ? 

2. How many show cause notices  are served to CJI , SCI  by Nagaraja M R , since 1990 ? 

3. Details of action taken in each case. If not why ? 

4. Why compensation amount is not yet paid by CJI , SCI to NAGARAJA M R , till date ? 

5. How CJI , SCI is going to  protect the lives , civil rights of NAGARAJA M R & his family members ?  If anything untoward happens to NAGARAJA M R & his family members  CJI , SCI  is responsible together with jurisdiction police & district magistrate. 

6. Why no  criminal legal prosecution of CJI , police , public servants  for their failure of duties ? 7. Honourable CJI , SCI   read  full case details at following web sites & honestly 

ANSWER : 

                  

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/answer-cji---loya-murder    ,                        https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/interrogate-chief-justice 

 

8. What action taken against police who tortured threatened witnesses to give false statements before court in sohrabuddin fake encounter case in first instance due to which innocents suffered in jail for years? What action against presiding judges , advocates of the case who failed to protect witnesses ? 

9. In Gauri Lankesh murder case suspects are alleging that they are being tortured to give confessions as per police diktat ? What action against police officials ? 

10. If at all police , judges , advocates accept 3rd degree TORTURE as right method to elicit truth why not CJI DIPAK MISHRA is subjected to 3rd degree TORTURE to elicit truth in fake affidavit case , prasad college case , kalikho pul case and why not 3rd degree TORTURE of police informing aiding dawood ibrahim , police doing dacoity at yelwal mysuru , DGP involved in lottery scam ? 

11.When police can subject a commoner alleged of small crimes like theft of hundred rupees to 3rd degree TORTURE why not police , judges , advocates , politicians alleged of anti national crimes , theft of crores of rupees , cheating , contempt of court / constitution , sex crimes , crimes against women SC / ST subjected to 3rd degree TORTURE? 

12.Why not 3rd degree TORTURE of Karnataka high court judges involved in mysore roost resort sex scandal to elicit truth? 

13. I have suffered numerous injustices for raising issues of public concern , national security. As a result i was threatened , physically assaulted, murder attempts made on me , my news paper closed , my job opportunities illegally snatched away, press accreditation denied , my human rights , FUNDAMENTAL rights repeatedly violated. It is the duty of supreme court of india to safeguard protect the rights of all indian citizens , but they failed to do their duties. Paradoxically after appealing to SCI only more injustices were meted out to me. Are SCI Judges hand in glove with anti nationals , criminals ? Why not 3rd degree TORTURE of SCI 

Judges to elicit truth ? 

14.Why not 3rd degree torture of past CBI Director Sinha who met representative of accused in his official residence more than 20 times ? 

15. Why not 3rd degree torture of crony Advocates who threaten truth seekers, to curry favors with corrupt judges , police & powers that be ? 

Please give information regarding above points and also read PIL at following web page. https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police   , https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/witness-protection-3rd-degree-torture   , https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/interrogate-cji-dgps  , 

16. Is powers that be and indian intelligence agencies behind assassination of late pm rajiv gandhi ? 

17. As I  raised my voice seeking justice , proper enquiry of rajiv gandhi assassination before supreme court of india  I have personally suffered more injustices . Are SCI judges hand in gloves with assassins ? 

18. Police complaints I made were not acted upon, keeping it pending for years without seeking permission from home ministry for sanction of legal prosecution of high & mighty, why ? Are they also hand in glove with criminals ? 

19. why difference in law enforcement  for same type of crime like sexual harassment against one by low ranking judge another by  high court , supreme court Judges? 

20. Why principals of PES ENGINEERING COLLEGE & NIE ENGINEERING COLLEGES , RBI NOTE PRESS , DISTRICT  JUDGES  OF  MYSURU & BANGALORE  CITY CIVIL COURT   ( who denied  job opportunities  to me  at the behest of criminal nexus ) were not interrogated  by  police  ? 

21. It is the duty of SCI to uphold , protect constitutional rights & human rights of every indian citizen , why you are not doing your duty inspite of  taking  hefty  pay  perks ? 

22. Why  press accreditation is denied to me while those covering  movies , lottery  , cooking are getting it ? 

23. Inspite of repeated  human rights abuses against me and others and  fervent  appeals to NHRC  They have failed in their duties , citing various  clauses sub sections of law they have dismissed my appeals. Do NHRC  members  know  the basics  A B C D of human rights ? Only human beings understand  sufferings  of other human beings. 

24. Police and intelligence officials have repeatedly  interrogated me based on my complaint. They never interrogated  the accused ? Why ? 

25. Few police even threatened me , where  was their bravery against  mighty  criminals ? 

26. Judges , Police who show their  might force  against  innocents , commoners  (  but same  judges , police are big zeroes before mighty criminals ) are  probable accomplices. I want  individual  wealth  details of  judges , police  personnel ( since past 20 years )  who interrogated me , who handled my complaints , appeals for justice and finally buried the cases under various pretexts. 

 

Answer  Honourable  CJI  SCI , Honourable  Chairman , NHRC &  Honourable  DG & IG of  Police  GOK 

 

To 

Honourable Chairman 

National Human Rights Commission 

New Delhi. 

 

Honourable Sir, 

 

Since 1990 , I as a citizen of India have brought to notice of SCI , NHRC & Police various crimes  hoping for justice to the  suffering public. Supreme court of India has enough time to judge trivial issues concerning movies , cricket , etc  but it doesn’t  have time to judge public  issues concerning national security , accountability of judges , police , public servants  in all these 28 years.  After repeatedly appealing for justice , powers that be have meted out injustices to me personally to silence me. SCI has failed in it’s duties  since 28 years , but judges are taking  hefty pay , perks from our money , public money  without feeling of shame or guilt. 

 

Hereby , I request Honourable CJI , SCI , Honourable Chairman , NHRC & Honourable DG & IG of Police , Government of Karnataka  , to  provide information  by answering  following questions : 

 

Subject : REPLY / OBJECTIONS in Case No. 888/10/15/2014 

 

Following points are my reply / objections to case closure refer your letter dated 18.09.2018. My whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , police & public service. 

 

1. Since 1990 how many applications of PIL , RTI are received by SCI , NHRC & Karnataka Police from me  NAGARAJA M R ? 

2. How many show cause notices  are served to CJI , SCI  by Nagaraja M R , since 1990 ? 

3. Details of action taken in each case. If not why ? 

4. Why compensation amount is not yet paid by CJI , SCI or NHRC to NAGARAJA M R , till date ? 

5. How CJI , SCI  & NHRC are  going to  protect the lives , civil rights of NAGARAJA M R & his family members ?  If anything untoward happens to NAGARAJA M R & his family members  CJI , SCI  is responsible together with NHRC , jurisdiction police & district magistrate. 

6. Why no  criminal legal prosecution of CJI , NHRC Chairman , police , public servants  for their failure of duties ? 

7. Honourable CJI , SCI  , Honourable Chairman , NHRC & Honourable DG & IG of Police , Government of Karnataka  read  full case details at following web sites & honestly 

ANSWER : 

 https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/answer-cji---loya-murder    ,             https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/interrogate-chief-justice , 

 

8. Statement of police are half truth. 

9. Statements / complaints made by me in my e mails / e news paper when I was in free & fair atmosphere holds good forever. It overrides statements made before police. 

10. Some of the complaints made by me are pending since years/  decades. Other than police summoning me repeatedly to question me , to take my statements , What else they have done?  Just based on my statements before police , police have filed case closures  subsequently NHRC / SCI   also  followed the  same course.  what other action did they take for years ? Did police , NHRC / SCI summon high & mighty people mentioned in my complaints even once ? Did they take their statements ? Did they conduct investigations? What are the outcome of those investigations ? Did police find out the persons & their motives for silencing me ? Did police police take action against them ? Have police formally requested government & supreme court for sanction to enquire powerful people enjoying legal immunity privileges? If not why ? 

11. Fed up with inaction of police for years and understanding their practical difficulties I have appealed to NHRC and Supreme Court of India by way of PILs seeking justice. Till date I have not got justice from NHRC or SCI. 

12. Public servants take thousands of rupees salary , perks every month on time without fail from public exchequer. But some of them don't do their duties properly in time. public made to wait for justice indefinitely for years together. 

13. Is it not the duty of government to protect life , rights of all citizens and to enable them to perform their duties ? If goverment cannot do it’s  duties  then such public servants are  waste bodies. 

14. Does not the  denial of justice in the above cases  to me  amount to cover up of crimes by police & judges ? 

15. I have answered questions of police , IB number of times now it is the turn of police, judges to answer my questions seeking truth. Please read following web pages and answer within six weeks : 

https://dalitsonline.blogspot.com/2018/08/torture-of-corrupt.html?m=1 

 

16. In war soldiers  cut off food / medicine supplies to enemy troops to cripple them , to reduce their fighting strength. In the same way my job opportunities in NIE Engineering college mysore PES college mandya RBI Press Mysuru RPG Cables mysuru Mysuru court & Bangalore courts were denied illegally. Who was behind it ? 

17. Who behind denying registration to my news paper & denying press accreditation to me ? 

18. Who behind physical assaults on me , threats to me , blank calls to me , stalking over my  family ? 

19. What action taken against those persons ? 

20. I request you for justice , legal prosecution of guilty , legal prosecution of police and judges who by their inaction helped in crimes cover up. 

21. As state police are not empowered hereby I request you for a  transparent  SIT probe monitored by NHRC & SCI. 

22. Hereby I state if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members dependents NHRC will be jointly liable with CJI , jurisdiction police & District Magistrate for the crime. 

 

23. Why i was not permitted to appear as an Amicus Curie before Jain commission of  enquiry  probing  Rajiv gandhi assassination case ? 

24. I have brought to the notice of SCI  land grabbing of hebbal lake , beml quarters lake, hootagalli lake in the very early stages. Due to your inaction grabbings took place continues till date. Are you not  complicit in the crimes ? 

25. Why no proper action taken against management of RPG Cables for their crimes ? 

26. Why i was not given legal aid to  pursue my cases in SCI ? 

27. If a commoner murders a person it is a crime if the same act done by police is it not a crime ? 

28. If a commoner gives a  false statement / false affidavit it is a crime , if the same act done by a judge, police, advocate is it not a crime ? 

29. I have given list of crimes  committed  by judges , police , advocates to you earlier  , still no proper  legal action taken against culprits why ? Are the rules , law different for them ? 

30. Few  advocates , police  , intellectuals ( ? ) have threatened me over phone , through social media , etc  to silence me. They are nothing but stooges , cronies of corrupt. Why no legal action against them for Obstructing my Fundamental Duties and  for violations of my fundamental rights , human rights ? 

31. I have  appealed to SCI regarding  cases of atrocities against Dalits. Till date no proper legal action taken why ? 

32. Are not the delays by you amount to denial of justice by way of time bar of case or death of  applicant ? 

33. Why SCI has not utilised my services to apprehend criminals within public service ? 

 

Date : 24.08.2021                                            Thank you 

Place : Mysuru                                                 Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi 

 

RTI  Request  to Honourable  Chief Justice  of  India , Chairman  National Human Rights Commission &  DG of  Police  all states & UTs,  Union  Home Minister 

 

RTI  Request  Ref no :  JUSTC/R/2019/52585 

 

Main  A 

1. Since 1990 how many applications of PIL , RTI are received by SCI from me  NAGARAJA M R ? 

2. How many show cause notices  are served to CJI , SCI  by Nagaraja M R , since 1990 ? 

3. Details of action taken in each case. If not why ? 

4. Why compensation amount is not yet paid by CJI , SCI to NAGARAJA M R , till date ? 

5. How CJI , SCI is going to  protect the lives , civil rights of NAGARAJA M R & his family members ?  If anything untoward happens to NAGARAJA M R & his family members  CJI , SCI  is responsible together with jurisdiction police & district magistrate. 

6. Why no  criminal legal prosecution of CJI , police , public servants  for their failure of duties ? 

7. Honourable CJI , SCI   read  full case details at following web sites & honestly ANSWER : 

                         https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/answer-cji---loya-murder   ,                          https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/interrogate-chief-justice 

 

Main  B 

 

1. Please give me The address  of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of india. Salary disbursing officer will be maintaining service records  of all employees of supreme court of india including judges. These records are used for disciplinary action , promotion , transfer of judges. If not within SCI , please give the address of the  outside public  official who maintains  service records of supreme court  judges and kindly compile  information from him and give it to me  orelse  transfer my RTI application to him. 

2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution  or not taking action. 

3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired  high  court judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution  or not taking action. 

4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired  district & taluk  court judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution  or not taking action. 

5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees  than stipulated by law. Eventhough  requisite fees  has been paid  before transfer of RTI application to high courts. Please give me the details of action taken by supreme court of india  against erring high courts. 

6. Give me the List of petitions  with date  made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi alias Nagaraja M R  TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH POST , THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH   website  of  DPG / DARPG.  Action taken or not taken with reasons thereof with respect to each petition. 

7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme  court of india , to safe guard the  

HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of  Nagaraja M R editor of SOS e Clarion of Dalit  & SOS e Voice for justice. He repeatedly  appealed to SCI  highlighting  violations of his human rights & fundamental rights. After appealing to SCI only  editor Nagaraja M R suffered more injustices , attempts on his life , etc  , may  be JUDGE’s MAFIA  is in deal with outside MAFIA. Police are helpless & practically don’t have  power to question supreme court judges & other VVIPs. Did SCI constitute SCI monitored enquiry committee  with full legal authority to look into the issue. 

8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give  lectures , judgements   running into hundreds  of pages  eliciting legality, moral virtues , humanity , etc.  But cover up information leading to crimes / accountability of judges.  The judges  committee  like a mafia deals it within  without subjecting the accussed judge to public scrutiny & public trial. It is almost similar to a  whore / bitch  giving a lecture on virginity  to women.  To refresh your memory  , Please  go through following websites  to  know about facts , actual cases of  crimes by judges. Please give us information  regarding action taken or not taken with reasons there of  with respect to each case mentioned in the  following websites: 

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police , https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges , http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System , http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal , 

 

9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners  , witnesses & evidences . 

10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by  high courts  of  india  to safeguard the human rights of prisoners  , witnesses & evidences . 

11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court judges & district / taluk judges  (both serving & retired) who received favourable allotment of sites , etc  which is nothing but a form of kick back  for favours  shown by judge. Please give me the list of action taken or not taken  by supreme court of india  with reasons  thereof  in each case. 

12. Please give me the list of action taken against  by supreme court of india  against  CPIO &  PIO  of supreme court of india  , who repeatedly failed to give  me information . thereby , CPIO & PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges , violating RTI Act & violating human rights / fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R together with public. 

 

Main  C : 

 1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women , irregularities , amassing disproportionate wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal allotment of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ? 

2. what action taken casewise ? 

3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same type of crimes ? 

4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other honest judges ? 

5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses / evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ?  if not why ? 

6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted by court for influencing , intimidating witnesses through threats , 3rddegree torture , for concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ? 

7. how many police / law enforcement officials  were prosecuted for lock-up deaths , fake encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree torture , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what  action ? if not why ? 

8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained & tortured , murdered by police , since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ? 

9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court  turns down the judgement of lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is made to pay compensation  to victims of their wrong judgement , since independence till date  yearwise ? what action ? if not why ? 

10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual  financial returns giving out their wealth , income details , yearwise since  independence till date ? what action ? if not why ? 

11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ? 

12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to “death by hanging” , yearwise ? 

13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ? 

14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation  & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if not why ? 

15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents  wrongly convicted by lower court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ? 

16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their  TA  DA  bill  while on  tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ? 

17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human & fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc  were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ? appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through DARPG , DPG. What  ACTION taken by supreme court of india with  respect to each appeal ? 

18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out to  public & public are still suffering injustices. Crimes which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court. What action against erring SC Judges ? if not why ? 

19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend criminals  within  judiciary , police & public service. What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ? 

20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI  judges  I have suffered murder attempts on my life , job losses , my newspaper closed , not getting press accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc. what action against erring chief justice of india ? if not why ? 

21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as amicus curie before supreme court of india   & jain commission of enquiry  regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not permitted why ? 

22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action taken ? if not why ? 

23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement  & law interpretation  is not same  for common people , Judges  & Police ? why ? 

 

Main  D : 

1. What  action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against women , casewise ? if not, why ? 

2. What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not , why ? 

3. I have shown with actual cases  how manipulation / fixing takes place , from  complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges & police , above law ? 

4. I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals  before supreme court of india. But they were  not registered , not honoured , why ? 

5. To my  legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme court of india & chief justice of india , till date I have not received the reply , why ? 

6. Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian citizens ? 

7. Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of  a complainant ? 

8. By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges  aiding & abetting  criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ? 

9. While crores of Indians are barely surviving  on a single piece meal a day , people dying due to starvation , supreme  court judges are getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees  from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those  duty shirking judges  ashamed ? 

10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination  case ? 

11. Why the supreme court of india didn’t allow me to appear before it  in the said case of  late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination  Case ? 

12. Why  the supreme court of india didn’t protect my life , my job oppurtunities , my newspaper  from the wrath of criminal  nexus ? 

13. When  even cable TV  journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not getting  PRESS accreditation since 9 years , why ? 

14. Are the supreme court  judges  hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ? 

Main  E : 

You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences. 

Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of information , but  amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of your’s  a crime in itself ? 

If your acts of crime cover-ups  , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding & abetting criminals , silencing a crusader  is just & legal. The same type of acts of crimes  performed by other citizens will also be legal ? 

Main  F : 

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions &  to the honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book. 

1. does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting  legal ? 

2. why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ? 

3. just remember , the  vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature & how some  MLAs   vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita  in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs  legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ? 

4. all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to president of India must read ABCD  Of Democracy  provide along with.since independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ? 

5. is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ? 

6. how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted? 

7. are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ? 

8. what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ? 

9. who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ? 

10. the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ? 

 Main  G : 

1. we do once again offer  our conditional services to the government of india , all state governments & supreme court of india , in apprehending  tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt  public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are not ready  to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ? 

2. the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ? 

3. why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ? 

4. why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union & state home ministries ? 

5. the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of India & national human rights  commission  has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case  ? is it because it  is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ? 

6. the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ? 

7. how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission  to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each complaint ? 

8. the delay in taking action by public servants  with respect to following cases has resulted in  more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records  and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in following cases ? 

SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIAhttp://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-tosupreme-… 

DEALS IN COURTS  &  POLICE  STATIONS   READ :http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyamevajayate  ,http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html  , 

ACCUSED Chief Justice of Indiahttp://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of… 

,http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of… 

CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF 

INDIA -http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  

,http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  , 

CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  

,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  , 

CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  

,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  

,http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  , 

CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIAhttp://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/ 

, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ 

CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/  , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/ 

, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/  , 

CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/  , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  , 

CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITEDhttp://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/  

,http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218 

MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIAhttp://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  

,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 

are you ready to catch tax thieves ?http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  

,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 

MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALShttp://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  

,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 

reliance industry where is accountability ?http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  

,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196 

crimes at infosys campushttp://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/  ,http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/  

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214 

crimes by B.D.A against a poor womanhttp://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/  

,http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 

crimes of land mafia in Indiahttp://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/  ,http://landscam.wordpress.com/   

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 

currency thefts in RBI Presshttp://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  ,http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/  

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80 

killer colas & killer medicines of Indiahttp://deathcola.blogpot.com/  ,http://deathcola.wordpress.com/  ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201 HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale 

Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP – pushpa kolasani  on hunger strike in anantapur  district jail Andhra Pradesh http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap 

9. how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral & illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ? 

10. what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ? 

11. have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions  taken by such judges of doubtful integrity & honesty ? 

12. is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect  the fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ? 

13. why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental rights & human rights of  me  & those mentioned in my complaint ? 

14. how many former CJIs  ,  supreme court & high court judges have disproportionate wealth ? 

15. Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests  amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ? 

16. why my previous RTI requests or part  there of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ? 

 

Main  H  : 

Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ? 

Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ? 

Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our motherland , it’s national security ? 

Q4. Don’t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law & order ? 

Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ? 

Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ? 

Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ? 

Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don’t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don’t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ? 

Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an “amicus curie” before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? 

Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ? 

Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ? 

Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ? 

Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards ? 

Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their family’s wealth year after year ? 

Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate’s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ? 

Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ? 

Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ? 

Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ? 

Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ? 

Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded “salwa judum” to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ? 

Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements & attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ? 

Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ? 

Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ? 

Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it’s products come with IMEI number only & stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their’s as it doesn’t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don’t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it’s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn’t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing 

Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file “B” report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ? 

Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with “B” report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ? 

Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ? 

Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ? 

Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ? 

Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ? 

Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ? 

Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn’t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ? 

Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ? 

Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ? 

Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people’s representatives are facing criminal charges ? 

Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ? 

Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ? 

Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ? 

Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people’s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ? 

Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ? 

Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ? 

Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ? 

Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ? 

Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ? 

Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ? 

Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi’s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ? 

Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it’s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it’s case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it’s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal ? 

Q48.what damages has been done to india’s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ? 

Q49. What action by the government ? 

Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ? 

Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ? 

Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ? 

Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ? 

Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ? 

Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ? 

Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan’s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ? 

Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my “fundamental duty” hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ? 

Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of defense forces ? 

Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ? 

Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ? 

Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ? 

Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ? 

Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ? 

Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ? 

Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ? 

Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ? 

Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ? 

Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters. 

Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ? 

Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ? 

Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date 

Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ? 

Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ? 

Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ? 

Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ? 

Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ? 

Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ? 

Q78. how ? if not why ? 

Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge’s family members ? 

Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ? 

Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ? 

Q82. is such statements made public , on web ? 

Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ? 

Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like “poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc” , in the interest of justice & truth ? 

Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of “Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society”. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society & allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society’s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ? 

Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ? 

Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person’s case responsible for it ? 

Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ? 

Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon. 

Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon. 

Q91. when a person doesn’t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person’s case responsible for it ? what action ? 

Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ? 

Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ? 

Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ? 

Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of misuse of office ? 

Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal actions as individuals ? 

Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ? 

Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ? 

Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ? 

Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ? 

Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures . 

Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ? 

Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ? 

Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer’s expense ? 

Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ? 

Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ? 

Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer’s expense ? 

Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ? 

Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ? 

Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ? 

Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing “amicus curie” in a case ? 

Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an “amicus curie” in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination case , was not considered by the court ? 

Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ? 

Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ? 

Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person’s rights violation ? 

Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards ? 

Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ? 

Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ? 

Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ? 

Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ? 

Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ? 

Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ? 

Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india’s on-line grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) : 

DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , 

DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , 

DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , 

DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , 

DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , 

DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , 

DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , 

DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , 

DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618 

Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at 

following web pageshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 

,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw what are the status of those appeals ? 

Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer. 

Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen’s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ? 

Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces. 

Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ? 

Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ? 

Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ? 

Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ? 

Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ? 

Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ? 

Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After india’s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ? 

Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ? 

Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ? 

Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it’s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ? 

Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ? 

Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ? 

Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences & prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ? 

Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ? 

Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ? 

Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ? Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of India? a) Inside the House b) Outside the House 

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like 

a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India 

c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC 

e) Central Vigilance Commissioners. 

Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ? 

a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit. 

b) Cover both their official & personal actions. 

Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ? 

Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ? 

Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ? 

Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ? 

Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ? 

Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ? 

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House. 

Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ? 

Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official’s secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges 

Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ? 

Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer’s money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ? 

Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more valid) in a democracy ? 

Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ? 

Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ? 

Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.? 

Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ? 

Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation” ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?. 

Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ? 

Q164. Communication – free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ? 

Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description of charges against them ? 

Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ? 

Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ? 

Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007. 

Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble 

Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ? 

Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings? 

Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ? 

Q 172 . What action  has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ? 

Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official  Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail  & flee the country without court’s permission ? 

Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court  & for aiding a criminal to escape ? 

Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?  what action has been taken against the CJI who  became an official of the  trust belonging to the criminal ? 

Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ? 

Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ? 

Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don’t have right to do so ? 

Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t  press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for  producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ? 

Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of  thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy? 

Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt  labour / pollution control board officials  HUMAN BEINGS ? 

Q  182    Why  police are  not registering my complaint   against  CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after years ? 

Q   183   don’t the  police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal  jurisdiction  to register  the case  against these VVIPs ? or  just  because the criminals happens to be VVIPs  ,they  are  not booked  by police? If the  said  police don’t have  legal jurisdiction to book  these VVIPs , they should have  transferred the complaint  to  those authorities who have jurisdiction &   authority to book  & prosecute   these  VVIPs , but not done  so , why ? 

Q  184  are not all these actions , of  VVIPs & police amounting to  cover up of crimes & criminals ? are  not  these cover ups itself is a crime ? 

Q  185.  Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals  for justice  concerning public welfare , national security  sent  through  post , e-mail  to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?  does  not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals? 

Q 186   Are not  the honourable chief justice of india  together  with the jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate  responsible  to protect  the  fundamental & human rights  of people ?  why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police  have failed to protect the fundamental & human rights of  people  including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus  Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional police  are  together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet  – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station  , mysore  will be responsible . 

These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more. 

Main I 

1. Since 1990 how many applications of PIL , RTI are received by SCI , NHRC & Karnataka Police from me  NAGARAJA M R ? 

2. How many show cause notices  are served to CJI , SCI  by Nagaraja M R , since 1990 ? 

3. Details of action taken in each case. If not why ? 

4. Why compensation amount is not yet paid by CJI , SCI or NHRC to NAGARAJA M R , till date ? 

5. How CJI , SCI  & NHRC are  going to  protect the lives , civil rights of NAGARAJA M R & his family members ?  If anything untoward happens to NAGARAJA M R & his family members  CJI , SCI  is responsible together with NHRC , jurisdiction police & district magistrate. 

6. Why no  criminal legal prosecution of CJI , NHRC Chairman , police , public servants  for their failure of duties ? 

7. Honourable CJI , SCI  , Honourable Chairman , NHRC & Honourable DG & IG of Police , Government of Karnataka  read  full case details at following web sites & honestly 

ANSWER : 

 https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/answer-cji---loya-murder    ,             https://sites.google.com/site/dalitoonline/interrogate-chief-justice , 

 

8. Statement of police are half truth. 

9. Statements / complaints made by me in my e mails / e news paper when I was in free & fair atmosphere holds good forever. It overrides statements made before police. 

10. Some of the complaints made by me are pending since years/  decades. Other than police summoning me repeatedly to question me , to take my statements , What else they have done?  Just based on my statements before police , police have filed case closures  subsequently NHRC / SCI   also  followed the  same course.  what other action did they take for years ? Did police , NHRC / SCI summon high & mighty people mentioned in my complaints even once ? Did they take their statements ? Did they conduct investigations? What are the outcome of those investigations ? Did police find out the persons & their motives for silencing me ? Did police police take action against them ? Have police formally requested government & supreme court for sanction to enquire powerful people enjoying legal immunity privileges? If not why ? 

11. Fed up with inaction of police for years and understanding their practical difficulties I have appealed to NHRC and Supreme Court of India by way of PILs seeking justice. Till date I have not got justice from NHRC or SCI. 

12. Public servants take thousands of rupees salary , perks every month on time without fail from public exchequer. But some of them don't do their duties properly in time. public made to wait for justice indefinitely for years together. 

13. Is it not the duty of government to protect life , rights of all citizens and to enable them to perform their duties ? If goverment cannot do it’s  duties  then such public servants are  waste bodies. 

14. Does not the  denial of justice in the above cases  to me  amount to cover up of crimes by police & judges ? 

15. I have answered questions of police , IB number of times now it is the turn of police, judges to answer my questions seeking truth. Please read following web pages and answer within six weeks : 

https://dalitsonline.blogspot.com/2018/08/torture-of-corrupt.html?m=1 

 

16. In war soldiers  cut off food / medicine supplies to enemy troops to cripple them , to reduce their fighting strength. In the same way my job opportunities in NIE Engineering college mysore PES college mandya RBI Press Mysuru RPG Cables mysuru Mysuru court & Bangalore courts were denied illegally. Who was behind it ? 

17. Who behind denying registration to my news paper & denying press accreditation to me ? 

18. Who behind physical assaults on me , threats to me , blank calls to me , stalking over my  family ? 

19. What action taken against those persons ? 

20. I request you for justice , legal prosecution of guilty , legal prosecution of police and judges who by their inaction helped in crimes cover up. 

21. As state police are not empowered hereby I request you for a  transparent  SIT probe monitored by NHRC & SCI. 

22. Hereby I state if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members dependents NHRC will be jointly liable with CJI , jurisdiction police & District Magistrate for the crime. 

 

23. Why i was not permitted to appear as an Amicus Curie before Jain commission of  enquiry  probing  Rajiv gandhi assassination case ? 

24. I have brought to the notice of SCI  land grabbing of hebbal lake , beml quarters lake, hootagalli lake in the very early stages. Due to your inaction grabbings took place continues till date. Are you not  complicit in the crimes ? 

25. Why no proper action taken against management of RPG Cables for their crimes ? 

26. Why i was not given legal aid to  pursue my cases in SCI ? 

27. If a commoner murders a person it is a crime if the same act done by police is it not a crime ? 

28. If a commoner gives a  false statement / false affidavit it is a crime , if the same act done by a judge, police, advocate is it not a crime ? 

29. I have given list of crimes  committed  by judges , police , advocates to you earlier  , still no proper  legal action taken against culprits why ? Are the rules , law different for them ? 

30. Few  advocates , police  , intellectuals ( ? ) have threatened me over phone , through social media , etc  to silence me. They are nothing but stooges , cronies of corrupt. Why no legal action against them for Obstructing my Fundamental Duties and  for violations of my fundamental rights , human rights ? 

31. I have  appealed to SCI regarding  cases of atrocities against Dalits. Till date no proper legal action taken why ? 

32. Are not the delays by you amount to denial of justice by way of time bar of case or death of  applicant ? 

33. Why SCI has not utilised my services to apprehend criminals within public service ? 

 

 

SILENCED  - Judge  Journalist  &  Police  https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2021/08/silenced-judge-journalist-

 

 

 

 

Answer CJI  &  Delhi Police Commissioner

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2021/08/answer-cji-delhi-police-commissioner.html?m=1 


Editorial : Judge  & Press Silenced ?


        Now in India we are witnessing sorry state of  affairs , where in a judge and journalist upholding democratic principles itself is perceived  as a crime. Police officer who investigated and deposed truth before Court of Justice , himself is sent behind bars. In contrast those trampling democratic rights, indulging in crimes are revered.  Almighty  must give them light of Wisdom.

         Jai Hind. Vande  Mataram.


Your's

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

         


 

Justice Kureshi’s Exclusion from SC Collegium List Sends a Message: Be Afraid


Justice Akil Kureshi, who sent Amit Shah to CBI custody, made the mistake of upholding his constitutional oath.

BY  SANJOY GHOSE


“A righteous government is of all the most to be wished for, Bearing of blessing and good fortune in the highest. Guided by the law of Truth, supported by dedication and zeal, it blossoms into the Best of Order, a Kingdom of Heaven! To effect this, I shall work now and ever more.”

— The Zend Avesta


A dastÅ«r, a trained Zoroastrian Priest, is well aware of this exhortation to establish a “righteous government” contained in his holy book, the Avesta. When a dastÅ«r adorns the high seat of the Supreme Court and is described by the Karta of India’s judiciary — Chief Justice N.V. Ramana — as “the Lion who guarded the judiciary”, one can imagine the extent to which he would strive to realise this hope for a “righteous government”. If reports, corridor whispers and legal grapevine are to be believed, Justice Rohinton Nariman did just that for several months when it came to the matter of filling the vacancies of the top court.

The colourful former Chief Justice S.A. Bobde had to hang in his boots without any success at nominating even a single justice to the Supreme Court while vacancies piled up through his months in office. It was reported that the principal obstacle in his path was the principled objection of Justice Nariman to the proposal to supersede one of India’s finest and most respected judges, the Chief Justice of Tripura High Court, Justice Akil Kureshi.


‘PREMIER’ COURTS

Much drama had preceded Justice Kureshi’s appointment even as a High Court Chief Justice, as he was transferred from Gujarat to Bombay and yet not appointed as the Chief of that Court, overlooking his seniority. The Collegium finally recommended him for Madhya Pradesh, and yet this was not acceptable to the Government. Months later, Justice Kureshi was appointed as Chief Justice of Tripura High Court, which is not perceived as a “premier” court such as Delhi or Bombay.

Incidentally, this concept of a “premier” court, a distinction alien to our constitution, was introduced into India’s judicial lexicon by the Collegium itself, when it appointed Justice Aniruddha Bose as Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court instead of Delhi. We learnt from the Collegium minutes, which used to be published in those days in lip service to the cause of transparency, that the Delhi High Court was a “premier” High Court.


While we will never have it officially, the black mark against Justice Kureshi is that he was the judge who had sent the present Union Home Minister, Amit Shah, into incarceration. While it is totally understandable for the ruling dispensation not to view his candidature favourably, what has raised eyebrows is the abject surrender of the court to the sentiment of the executive.

PRINCIPLE VS PRACTICALITY

Conceded that the Chief Justice and his Collegium colleagues had an unenviable task — reconciling principle with practicality. However, at the end of the day, what was at stake was to send a strong message to our fearless and independent judges that they must all aspire to be the “lion” that Justice Ramana described Justice Nariman as.

Within days of the “lion” compliment, the recast Collegium promptly cleared nine names, overlooking the case of the bold and competent Justice Kureshi, whose only fault, it seems, was to have taken his constitutional oath seriously.


The impasse in the preceding months has a context. While the Court had clothed itself with primacy in matters of judicial appointments through its judicial rulings and technically all it had to do in the wake of executive disagreement was to reiterate its recommendation for the same to be binding, the recent experience with the government had possibly made the Court wise to the certainty that principle would only be met with procrastination. If an “unwelcome” nomination made its way from the Court to the government, the latter would simply sit over the recommendations for months. Also, administratively, it would be viewed as a hostile action that would certainly not be well-received. Possibly, it could also end up souring the relations between these two branches and cast its shadow upon a number of aspects where the court needs the cooperation of the government of the day.


The Collegium had to make a tough call, and it decided that Kureshi would have to take the fall. It chose compromise over confrontation, prudence over principle. Ironically, in doing so, it has driven another nail into its coffin of credibility.


The message that this compromise sends out to the judicial family is “be afraid”. Given the media and social media — this “surrender” is also causing a fair amount of consternation in non-legal circles.

A FAILED ATTEMPT AT TRANSPARENCY

The Collegium system was judicially evolved by the Court to promote merit and insulate the judiciary from executive interference. Over the years, it is more than established from how it has dealt with appointments to our constitutional courts that the Collegium system has woefully failed on both scores. Even its brief flirtation with transparency, when it was decided that minutes of meetings would be published, was a total disaster, ending up maligning the reputation of judges and lawyers.

This recent episode perhaps makes the most compelling case for a comprehensive reconsideration to institutionalise greater transparency and accountability. While India may not be ready for an American-type system where the Senate Judiciary Committee publicly grills judicial nominees through an intensive confirmation process, at least some institutional form of obtaining the inputs from senior and respected members of the Bar and the community at large must be explored and the process made less opaque.

As I began with the Avesta, it would only be fitting I conclude with the same. The Avesta also says:

“Let those who know how to rule well, and not the evil rulers, rule us! Let them Rule us with wisdom-rule us with skill O Piety.”


Persecution  of Sanjeev Bhatt IPS

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com/2021/07/persecution-of-sanjeev-bhatt-ips.html?m=1  


 Press Accreditation


From,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi ,

Editor , Dalit  Online  & Deccan Inquirer,

# LIG 2 , No 761, HUDCO  First Stage,

Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal ,

Mysuru – 570017.

 

To,

 Honourable District Magistrate ,

Mysuru District ,

Mysuru – 570001

 

Dear Sir ,

 Subject :  Web Paper Registration & Press  Accreditation

           Journalists  are those  who collect , analyze ,  report  & publish  news.    As per law  in India, Journalists are not granted any special rights or privileges and are on par with the  Citizens of India. Every citizen of India has the right to question the government , public servants about their public duties.  Journalists & citizens have the same , equal rights & responsibilities as per law.  Paradox is  those questioning citizens are made fun of & silenced by authorities.

           As per law in India , Digital News Papers are  not registered. Since years our publication is  not registered  and even press accreditation is denied to us ( at the behest of powers that be / mafia ? ) , whereas even those  journalists  covering  cookery , lottery  , movies are given press accreditation.  Press Accreditation is  an administrative convenience mechanism  by authorities  giving access to journalists.  If a Journalist or Citizen  does not have press accreditation  that does not entitle authorities to deny him access to information , news. Sadly , authorities are doing that which is against law.

         Hereby , I  am  once again submitting declaration  about my two web news paper publications  and request you for  officially noting it ( as registration is not  legally possible )  and to issue me press accreditation. I am herewith submitting  my  application digitally signed by me together  with  ID proofs , for your needful.

 

Date : 22.08.2021                            Thanking You,

Place : Mysuru                                 Nagaraja  M R

                                                                                                               

Copies sent to :

1.       Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.

2.       Honourable Chairman , National Human Rights Commission , New Dehi.

3.       Honourable High Commissioner , OHCHR , United Nations , Geneva , Switzerland.

4.     Registrar of  News Papers for India  New Delhi

5.     Director Department of Information  GOK Begaluru

6.      Director  Department of  Information  & Broadcasting  GOI New  Delhi

7.      Director   Press Information  Bureau  GOI  New  Delhi

 

 

                                                           DECLARATION 1



 

 





Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R. 




Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP

WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA



Web News Paper Title : DALIT ONLINE



Periodicity : WEEKLY




Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB




Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .




Monetary Gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.




Owner/Editor/Printer/Publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.




Nationality : INDIAN




Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R ,  is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students. 




Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy. 




Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in        

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com     

 

 Contact  :  editor@dalitonline.in   ,

 editor.dalitonline@gmail.com

 



UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479 


Cell :   91  8970318202 

It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since 25 years  I am  appealing  to SCI  about  issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly violated  but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made ,  physically assaulted , livelihood  / jobs were  denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied ,  received threatening  calls , blank calls, even to date  rough elements follow us , rough elements  scout  near home at mid night. Does  not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI  Judges ?

 

Public Interest Litigation is an appeal  for justice  to the courts , to redress  the injustices meted out to  the public.  Individual cases of injustices  pertaining to an individual are not covered under PIL, however  an individual an activist  who  is fighting for public causes  suffering  injustices  as a result of   his struggle  ,caused by powers that be to silence him  can club  his individual case under the public causes  (PIL ) he is  appealing.

 

Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity  are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india.  In the following web sites I have shown  few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.

Traitors  in   Indian  Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes  by  Khaki

https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki  ,

 Police show full bravery , courage , use  full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even  takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits  while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search  , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues  no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint  allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while  judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action  where as  cases involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?


I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective. 

   Powers that  be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases  police don’t  have jurisdiction over it.  It  sends  a subtle message by police force to  the  complainant  to keep silent . In the remaining cases  which are under their jurisdiction police  don’t act against higher ups , high & mighty. In such cases police lack  practical powers , their hands are tied although they  are  honest.  As a end result , police  have repeatedly called   me to police station  number of  times  ( have never called guilty  influential persons even once)  took  statement  from  me and closed  the files.  Hereby , I do make it clear  the statements made by me  in my original petitions , PILs , news papers  , etc  while I was in  a free & fair atmosphere  are  TRUE  , over rides , prevails over all the statements made by me before police  earlier and  which will be made by me  in future before police.



If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries. 

 

date :  22.08.2021…………………………..Your's sincerely,


place : India…………………………………...Nagaraja.M.R. 

 

 


 


 



 

                                                   DECLARATION 2

 

 

 

 




Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.


Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,

OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE ,

LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,

HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA




Web News  Paper  Title : Deccan Inquirer


Periodicity : WEEKLY


Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB


Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .


Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.


Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.


Nationality : INDIAN


Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R ,   is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore             ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.


Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R ,   are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.

 

Home page :

http://di.dalitonline.in  

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com   

 

Contact  :  DI@dalitonline.in   , deccan.inquirer@gmail.com   



UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479 

Cell : 91 8970318202

It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since 25 years  I am  appealing  to SCI  about  issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly violated  but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made ,  physically assaulted , livelihood  / jobs were  denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied ,  received threatening  calls , blank calls, even to date  rough elements follow us , rough elements  scout  near home at mid night. Does  not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI  Judges ?

 

Public Interest Litigation is an appeal  for justice  to the courts , to redress  the injustices meted out to  the public.  Individual cases of injustices  pertaining to an individual are not covered under PIL, however  an individual an activist  who  is fighting for public causes  suffering  injustices  as a result of   his struggle  ,caused by powers that be to silence him  can club  his individual case under the public causes  (PIL ) he is  appealing.

 

Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity  are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india.  In the following web sites I have shown  few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.

Traitors  in   Indian  Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes  by  Khaki

https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki  ,

Police show full bravery , courage , use  full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even  takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits  while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search  , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues  no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint  allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while  judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action  where as  cases involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?


I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.

Powers that  be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases  police don’t  have jurisdiction over it.  It  sends  a subtle message by police force to  the  complainant  to keep silent . In the remaining cases  which are under their jurisdiction police  don’t act against higher ups , high & mighty. In such cases police lack  practical powers , their hands are tied although they  are  honest.  As a end result , police  have repeatedly called   me to police station  number of  times  ( have never called guilty  influential persons even once)  took  statement  from  me and closed  the files.

 

Hereby , I do make it clear  the statements made by me  in my original petitions , PILs , news papers  , etc  while I was in  a free & fair atmosphere  are  TRUE  , over rides , prevails over all the statements made by me before police  earlier and  which will be made by me  in future before police.

 

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members – In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries.

 

date :  22.08.2021…………………………..Your’s sincerely,

place : India……………………………………Nagaraja.M.R.



 



Dalit-Online at 9:10 PM

Share

No comments:

Post a Comment

Home

View web version

About Me

 

Dalit-Online

View my complete profile

Powered by Blogger.



Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761, 

HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA     Cell : 91 8970318202 

  WhatsApp  91  8970318202 

  

  

Home page : 

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in        https://dalit-online.blogspot.com  

  

 Contact  :  editor@dalitonline.in   ,  editor.dalitonline@gmail.com  

 

  

 


Sunday, August 22, 2021

SILENCED - Judge Journalist Police ?

 


 Dalit-Online 

Weekly e news paper 

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.17....Issue. 34............22/08/2021

 

Answer CJI  &  Delhi Police Commissioner

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2021/08/answer-cji-delhi-police-commissioner.html?m=1 


Editorial : Judge  & Press Silenced ?

        Now in India we are witnessing sorry state of  affairs , where in a judge and journalist upholding democratic principles itself is perceived  as a crime. Police officer who investigated and deposed truth before Court of Justice , himself is sent behind bars. In contrast those trampling democratic rights, indulging in crimes are revered.  Almighty  must give them light of Wisdom.

         Jai Hind. Vande  Mataram.


Your's

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

         


 

Justice Kureshi’s Exclusion from SC Collegium List Sends a Message: Be Afraid


Justice Akil Kureshi, who sent Amit Shah to CBI custody, made the mistake of upholding his constitutional oath.

BY  SANJOY GHOSE


“A righteous government is of all the most to be wished for, Bearing of blessing and good fortune in the highest. Guided by the law of Truth, supported by dedication and zeal, it blossoms into the Best of Order, a Kingdom of Heaven! To effect this, I shall work now and ever more.”

— The Zend Avesta


A dastÅ«r, a trained Zoroastrian Priest, is well aware of this exhortation to establish a “righteous government” contained in his holy book, the Avesta. When a dastÅ«r adorns the high seat of the Supreme Court and is described by the Karta of India’s judiciary — Chief Justice N.V. Ramana — as “the Lion who guarded the judiciary”, one can imagine the extent to which he would strive to realise this hope for a “righteous government”. If reports, corridor whispers and legal grapevine are to be believed, Justice Rohinton Nariman did just that for several months when it came to the matter of filling the vacancies of the top court.

The colourful former Chief Justice S.A. Bobde had to hang in his boots without any success at nominating even a single justice to the Supreme Court while vacancies piled up through his months in office. It was reported that the principal obstacle in his path was the principled objection of Justice Nariman to the proposal to supersede one of India’s finest and most respected judges, the Chief Justice of Tripura High Court, Justice Akil Kureshi.


‘PREMIER’ COURTS

Much drama had preceded Justice Kureshi’s appointment even as a High Court Chief Justice, as he was transferred from Gujarat to Bombay and yet not appointed as the Chief of that Court, overlooking his seniority. The Collegium finally recommended him for Madhya Pradesh, and yet this was not acceptable to the Government. Months later, Justice Kureshi was appointed as Chief Justice of Tripura High Court, which is not perceived as a “premier” court such as Delhi or Bombay.

Incidentally, this concept of a “premier” court, a distinction alien to our constitution, was introduced into India’s judicial lexicon by the Collegium itself, when it appointed Justice Aniruddha Bose as Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court instead of Delhi. We learnt from the Collegium minutes, which used to be published in those days in lip service to the cause of transparency, that the Delhi High Court was a “premier” High Court.


While we will never have it officially, the black mark against Justice Kureshi is that he was the judge who had sent the present Union Home Minister, Amit Shah, into incarceration. While it is totally understandable for the ruling dispensation not to view his candidature favourably, what has raised eyebrows is the abject surrender of the court to the sentiment of the executive.

PRINCIPLE VS PRACTICALITY

Conceded that the Chief Justice and his Collegium colleagues had an unenviable task — reconciling principle with practicality. However, at the end of the day, what was at stake was to send a strong message to our fearless and independent judges that they must all aspire to be the “lion” that Justice Ramana described Justice Nariman as.

Within days of the “lion” compliment, the recast Collegium promptly cleared nine names, overlooking the case of the bold and competent Justice Kureshi, whose only fault, it seems, was to have taken his constitutional oath seriously.


The impasse in the preceding months has a context. While the Court had clothed itself with primacy in matters of judicial appointments through its judicial rulings and technically all it had to do in the wake of executive disagreement was to reiterate its recommendation for the same to be binding, the recent experience with the government had possibly made the Court wise to the certainty that principle would only be met with procrastination. If an “unwelcome” nomination made its way from the Court to the government, the latter would simply sit over the recommendations for months. Also, administratively, it would be viewed as a hostile action that would certainly not be well-received. Possibly, it could also end up souring the relations between these two branches and cast its shadow upon a number of aspects where the court needs the cooperation of the government of the day.


The Collegium had to make a tough call, and it decided that Kureshi would have to take the fall. It chose compromise over confrontation, prudence over principle. Ironically, in doing so, it has driven another nail into its coffin of credibility.


The message that this compromise sends out to the judicial family is “be afraid”. Given the media and social media — this “surrender” is also causing a fair amount of consternation in non-legal circles.

A FAILED ATTEMPT AT TRANSPARENCY

The Collegium system was judicially evolved by the Court to promote merit and insulate the judiciary from executive interference. Over the years, it is more than established from how it has dealt with appointments to our constitutional courts that the Collegium system has woefully failed on both scores. Even its brief flirtation with transparency, when it was decided that minutes of meetings would be published, was a total disaster, ending up maligning the reputation of judges and lawyers.

This recent episode perhaps makes the most compelling case for a comprehensive reconsideration to institutionalise greater transparency and accountability. While India may not be ready for an American-type system where the Senate Judiciary Committee publicly grills judicial nominees through an intensive confirmation process, at least some institutional form of obtaining the inputs from senior and respected members of the Bar and the community at large must be explored and the process made less opaque.

As I began with the Avesta, it would only be fitting I conclude with the same. The Avesta also says:

“Let those who know how to rule well, and not the evil rulers, rule us! Let them Rule us with wisdom-rule us with skill O Piety.”


Persecution  of Sanjeev Bhatt IPS

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com/2021/07/persecution-of-sanjeev-bhatt-ips.html?m=1  


 Press Accreditation


From,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi ,

Editor , Dalit  Online  & Deccan Inquirer,

# LIG 2 , No 761, HUDCO  First Stage,

Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal ,

Mysuru – 570017.

 

To,

 Honourable District Magistrate ,

Mysuru District ,

Mysuru – 570001

 

Dear Sir ,

 Subject :  Web Paper Registration & Press  Accreditation

           Journalists  are those  who collect , analyze ,  report  & publish  news.    As per law  in India, Journalists are not granted any special rights or privileges and are on par with the  Citizens of India. Every citizen of India has the right to question the government , public servants about their public duties.  Journalists & citizens have the same , equal rights & responsibilities as per law.  Paradox is  those questioning citizens are made fun of & silenced by authorities.

           As per law in India , Digital News Papers are  not registered. Since years our publication is  not registered  and even press accreditation is denied to us ( at the behest of powers that be / mafia ? ) , whereas even those  journalists  covering  cookery , lottery  , movies are given press accreditation.  Press Accreditation is  an administrative convenience mechanism  by authorities  giving access to journalists.  If a Journalist or Citizen  does not have press accreditation  that does not entitle authorities to deny him access to information , news. Sadly , authorities are doing that which is against law.

         Hereby , I  am  once again submitting declaration  about my two web news paper publications  and request you for  officially noting it ( as registration is not  legally possible )  and to issue me press accreditation. I am herewith submitting  my  application digitally signed by me together  with  ID proofs , for your needful.

 

Date : 22.08.2021                            Thanking You,

Place : Mysuru                                 Nagaraja  M R

                                                                                                               

Copies sent to :

1.       Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.

2.       Honourable Chairman , National Human Rights Commission , New Dehi.

3.       Honourable High Commissioner , OHCHR , United Nations , Geneva , Switzerland.

4.     Registrar of  News Papers for India  New Delhi

5.     Director Department of Information  GOK Begaluru

6.      Director  Department of  Information  & Broadcasting  GOI New  Delhi

7.      Director   Press Information  Bureau  GOI  New  Delhi

 

 

                                                           DECLARATION 1



 

 





Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R. 




Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP

WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA



Web News Paper Title : DALIT ONLINE



Periodicity : WEEKLY




Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB




Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .




Monetary Gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.




Owner/Editor/Printer/Publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.




Nationality : INDIAN




Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R ,  is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students. 




Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy. 




Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in        

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com     

 

 Contact  :  editor@dalitonline.in   ,

 editor.dalitonline@gmail.com

 



UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479 


Cell :   91  8970318202 

It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since 25 years  I am  appealing  to SCI  about  issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly violated  but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made ,  physically assaulted , livelihood  / jobs were  denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied ,  received threatening  calls , blank calls, even to date  rough elements follow us , rough elements  scout  near home at mid night. Does  not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI  Judges ?

 

Public Interest Litigation is an appeal  for justice  to the courts , to redress  the injustices meted out to  the public.  Individual cases of injustices  pertaining to an individual are not covered under PIL, however  an individual an activist  who  is fighting for public causes  suffering  injustices  as a result of   his struggle  ,caused by powers that be to silence him  can club  his individual case under the public causes  (PIL ) he is  appealing.

 

Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity  are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india.  In the following web sites I have shown  few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.

Traitors  in   Indian  Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes  by  Khaki

https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki  ,

 Police show full bravery , courage , use  full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even  takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits  while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search  , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues  no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint  allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while  judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action  where as  cases involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?


I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective. 

   Powers that  be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases  police don’t  have jurisdiction over it.  It  sends  a subtle message by police force to  the  complainant  to keep silent . In the remaining cases  which are under their jurisdiction police  don’t act against higher ups , high & mighty. In such cases police lack  practical powers , their hands are tied although they  are  honest.  As a end result , police  have repeatedly called   me to police station  number of  times  ( have never called guilty  influential persons even once)  took  statement  from  me and closed  the files.  Hereby , I do make it clear  the statements made by me  in my original petitions , PILs , news papers  , etc  while I was in  a free & fair atmosphere  are  TRUE  , over rides , prevails over all the statements made by me before police  earlier and  which will be made by me  in future before police.



If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries. 

 

date :  22.08.2021…………………………..Your's sincerely,


place : India…………………………………...Nagaraja.M.R. 

 

 


 


 



 

                                                   DECLARATION 2

 

 

 

 




Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.


Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,

OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE ,

LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,

HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA




Web News  Paper  Title : Deccan Inquirer


Periodicity : WEEKLY


Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB


Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .


Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.


Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.


Nationality : INDIAN


Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R ,   is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore             ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.


Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R ,   are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.

 

Home page :

http://di.dalitonline.in  

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com   

 

Contact  :  DI@dalitonline.in   , deccan.inquirer@gmail.com   



UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479 

Cell : 91 8970318202

It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since 25 years  I am  appealing  to SCI  about  issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly violated  but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made ,  physically assaulted , livelihood  / jobs were  denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied ,  received threatening  calls , blank calls, even to date  rough elements follow us , rough elements  scout  near home at mid night. Does  not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI  Judges ?

 

Public Interest Litigation is an appeal  for justice  to the courts , to redress  the injustices meted out to  the public.  Individual cases of injustices  pertaining to an individual are not covered under PIL, however  an individual an activist  who  is fighting for public causes  suffering  injustices  as a result of   his struggle  ,caused by powers that be to silence him  can club  his individual case under the public causes  (PIL ) he is  appealing.

 

Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity  are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india.  In the following web sites I have shown  few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.

Traitors  in   Indian  Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes  by  Khaki

https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki  ,

Police show full bravery , courage , use  full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even  takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits  while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search  , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues  no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint  allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while  judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action  where as  cases involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?


I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.

Powers that  be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases  police don’t  have jurisdiction over it.  It  sends  a subtle message by police force to  the  complainant  to keep silent . In the remaining cases  which are under their jurisdiction police  don’t act against higher ups , high & mighty. In such cases police lack  practical powers , their hands are tied although they  are  honest.  As a end result , police  have repeatedly called   me to police station  number of  times  ( have never called guilty  influential persons even once)  took  statement  from  me and closed  the files.

 

Hereby , I do make it clear  the statements made by me  in my original petitions , PILs , news papers  , etc  while I was in  a free & fair atmosphere  are  TRUE  , over rides , prevails over all the statements made by me before police  earlier and  which will be made by me  in future before police.

 

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members – In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries.

 

date :  22.08.2021…………………………..Your’s sincerely,

place : India……………………………………Nagaraja.M.R.



 


 


 




 

 

  

 Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761, HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA     Cell : 91 8970318202

  WhatsApp  91  8970318202

 

 

Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in        

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com     

 

 Contact  :  editor@dalitonline.in   ,

 editor.dalitonline@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dalit-Online at 12:18 PM

Share

No comments:

Post a Comment

Home

View web version

About Me

 

Dalit-Online

View my complete profile

Powered by Blogger.



Sunday, August 15, 2021

Independence and Fundamental Duties

 Dalit-Online

Weekly e news paper 

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.17....Issue. 33............15/08/2021





 Answer  Honourable  CJI & Delhi  Police  Commissioner

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2021/08/answer-cji-delhi-police-commissioner.html?m=1  



Editorial :  FUNDAMENTAL  DUTIES  Vs   Corrupt   Judges   Police  Public  Servants


                                Fundamental  Duties of  Citizens  and  Constitutional Duties  of  Public Servants are complementary to each other.   Nowadays  criminalization of politics , judiciary  , police , etc has  taken place and many unfit candidates are in public service. These corrupt , unfit public servants  are misusing their offices and  putting  legal seal    on illegal  acts , making those illegal acts technically legal. Here  raises the conflict between  FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF AN INDIAN CITIZEN  and   ILLEGAL  ACTS  OF  GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.


           For example real estate mafia grabs  BEML Quarters lake ,  Kaynes Hootagalli Lake , Ningaih lake , Hebbal lakes in mysuru  creates  fake title deeds  and  even gets it registered  by sub registrar  all with the help corrupt officials in  government.  Even police protect the  rich  land grabber. When a case is made out in the court of law  for eviction of lake encroachers , judge simply goes through the technicalities of government documents. Based  on official documents he  gives   green signal to encroacher and orders for  protection of his encroached properties.  Lakes  are  nobody’s property , it is  a public property and to be preserved for public usage.  The good Samaritan Indian Citizen who did his  “Fundamental Duties  of Protecting Lakes “  lost money , time,  faced  abuses / remarks from the judge , faced life threat from land mafia & police. All for nothing.


          One more example  , a  citizen while passing through a  public  road  witnesses  an accident , takes the injured to the hospital for emergency treatment to save life and informs  police regarding accident making vehicle. Instead of appreciating  his  good   work , police fits  him in the case , case drags on for years making the good citizen loose his money , time & job. Also , he is threatened by vehicle owner  who made the accident , no protection to  the citizen for doing his :Fundamental Duties”.


          One more example , a citizen complained to authorities  regarding  business of a liquor bar  in a residential location  much close to religious  building & schools. The bar owner had secured license from state excise  department much against the norms.  Police called the good citizen for questioning repeatedly , court  judge called him to court repeatedly  and finally based on the license given by corrupt government official  allowed the bar to operate  , fined the complainant.  Goons of bar owner  roughed up the good citizen making him to move away from the locality itself.   


           An Indian citizen  requests  for information from authorities  regarding  llegalities , irregularities , misuse of office  in working  by judges , police , etc  from  supreme court of india and other related authorities under RTI Act. So that  based on RTI  reply from concerned authorities  he can legally prosecute  the guilty judges , police , public servants , can get the  injustices rectified by court of law and  put an end to further crimes by those guilty , corrupt public servants all in public interest. This  is an effort by that Indian citizen as his “FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES”  to uphold law , constitution of india. But  PIOs , RTI Appellate authorities  of  supreme court of  india  & other  bodies didn’t  give full truthful information at all . Thereby ,  they  committed one more crime of  of covering up another crime  and aiding criminals to continue with their crimes unabated.  Thereby , guilty judges , police , other public servants obstructed the  citizen from performing his FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES , Violated his FUNNDAMENTAL  RIGHTS  &  HUMAN  RIGHTS  TO  EQUITABLE  JUSTICE.  No justice in sight till date to good Samaritan Indian citizen  , more injustices were meted out to him by judges , police , public servants -  he suffered  physical assaults , murder attempts , jobs denied , news paper closed , press accreditation  denied ,  PILs  he sent to apex court were not admitted , all to silence him.


       In this way , there are numerous cases  of  Indian Citizens , whistle blowers , RTI Activists , Journalists  who themselves suffered  gross injustices for raising public causes , for doing their  Fundamental Duties. No  Justice to them even from apex court till date.


         Every citizen  of  india must  perform   his / her “Fundamental  Duties” without fail, before demanding  his fundamental rights. Every public servant  must  do their  constitutional duties without fail. 


         A citizen performs  fundamental duties without any rewards or pay or perks  where as a government official /  public servant does his / her duties  for  huge pay & perks.


         A citizen  while performing his fundamental duties  often has to spend his own money , time  to fight legal cases , etc. Whereas a public servant spends nothing during the course of his public duties, everything is borne by state exchequer.


      A citizen  while performing  his fundamental duties faces rowdy elements , physical assaults  in few instances even resulting in his own murder.  His family doesn’t get even a penny compensation from exchequer. Whereas a public servant enjoys the full police protection in the course of his duties and even if  anything untoward  happens his family will get  compensation.


     Obstructing  a Citizen  from performing his fundamental duties  doesn’t  attract any legal prosecution whereas obstruction of  public servant’s  constitutional duties is a crime under IPC.


    Therefore in order to preserve , uphold democracy , Constitution of india , apex court must  order  Central Governments , All State Governments and other  Statutory  bodies :


1.         To  make  obstruction of  “Fundamental Duties  of an Indian Citizen” a legally punishable offence on par with the  obstruction of a public servant’s duties.


2.         To pay compensation of Rupees Two Crores and above  to   RTI Activists , Whistle Blowers , Journalists , ordinary citizens who paid with their lives or suffered  injuries in the course of their  fundamental duties.


3.         To order for  inspection , investigation of each & every issue raised by  a citizen in the course of his fundamental duties  instead of simply relying on government records alone prepared by corrupt officials.


4.         To order all public servants including judges , Members of Parliament , Members of Legislative Assemblies , IAS officers  , other public servants  to do their  constitutional duties  properly.


Your’s ,


Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi


 


Important duties of a citizen towards his  Motherland  /  State


 


(a) Allegiance:


Every citizen is expected to be loyal to the state. His or her loyalty should, in no case, be divided. The state expects unstinted allegiance from its citizens.


(b) Obedience:


All the citizens should willingly and habitually obey the laws of the state. A democratic government is a government of the people themselves. Laws reflect their own will. There should not be, therefore, any hesitation in the obedience of laws.


(c) Payment of Taxes:


The administration of a country involves a certain amount of expenditure. This expenditure cannot be met without raising certain taxes. Citizens in their own interest, should, therefore willingly and honestly make payment of their taxes.


(d) Public Spirit:


Every citizen should be public spirited. He should not seek his self-interest and should always be ready to contribute his mite to the welfare of society.


(e) Honest exercise of Franchise:


Vote is a sacred trust in the hands of the citizens. It should always be used judiciously. Suitable represen-tatives should be sent to the legislatures. A wrong use of vote may result in a bad government.


(J) Help to Public Officials in the maintenance of Law and Order:


It is the duty of every citizen to lend a hand of co-operation to public officials in the discharge of their duties. Every citizen should try to remove evils and crimes from society by rendering help to the officials concerned.


(g) Work:


Every able-bodied citizen should work and try to add something to the social fund. Idlers are a parasite on the society. Work brings in wealth and prosperity in the country. In countries like Russia work is considered to be a legal duty.


(h) Toleration:


Every citizen is expected to be tolerant towards others. Their religious beliefs "Do unto others what you wish to be done by," should be the motto before every citizen.


(j) Resistance:


It is more or less a moral duty. It is the duty of a good citizen to resist injustice from any quarter. If the government is unjust, it may also be resisted.


 


 


The Fundamental Duties


-           Speech   by Justice Kurian Joseph


 


The following ten Fundamental Duties were introduced by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 — Article 51-A:


It shall be the duty of every citizen of India:


 


 To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem.


To cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom; to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India.


To defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so.


To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities and to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.


To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.


To protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures.


To develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform.


To safeguard public property and to abjure violence.


To strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity.


So that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement. Subsequently, another duty was added by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2002: for a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education of the child or ward between the age of six and fourteen.


 


Since then, the scope of Fundamental Rights under Part III of the Constitution has seen significant expansion through judicial pronouncements; the right to free legal services to the poor, right to speedy trial and right to live in a clean and healthy environment are just a few examples. As a result, an imbalance has been created between the current set of Fundamental Rights and Duties. Here is an attempt to examine if a few additional Fundamental Duties in the Constitution of this country could help in balancing out the rights of its citizens and further make them more responsible towards the country’s development.


Additional duties


 


Duty to vote: Article 326 of the Constitution read with Section 62 of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 confers the right to vote. However, quite often the question arises as to whether that right also implies an obligation. The voter turnout during the last general election amounted only to about 67 per cent. This voter apathy should be taken seriously and an attempt should be made to make voting a citizenship obligation.


The state can take several steps to ensure that this duty to vote is made operational and effective. One method through which this may be achieved is by developing a system of incentives for voters and conversely disadvantages for those who abstain from performing their duty to vote. A very large section of people can be motivated to vote this way.


Duty to pay taxes: The tax gap (the revenue that a government is expected to receive as against the revenue it actually collects) continues to increase every year. The greatest indicator of this is the fact that the size of India’s shadow economy as a share of the GDP reached 24.3 per cent in the year 2012. Research has found that tax evasion is a direct result of lack of trust among the people, in general, and the government, in particular. Citizens must believe that their taxes are bound to be used for public good. The incorporation of the right to pay taxes as part of Fundamental Duties in the Constitution will shift the onus onto the taxpayer to pay taxes rather than the tax department to collect them.


Duty to help accident victims: Every 60 minutes, 16 persons die in traffic accidents in India. According to the Law Commission of India, at least 50 per cent of fatalities can be prevented if road accident victims receive medical attention within the critical first hour after the accident. The Karnataka government’s decision to frame a ‘Good Samaritan law’ is a step in the right direction. With the increase in the number of accidents, it has become pertinent for India to recognise this duty as one owed by its citizens towards each other.


Duty to keep the premises clean: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Swachh Bharat Mission has received tremendous support from people from all walks of life. The most effective mechanism to tackle uncleanliness is to sensitise people about this duty. Therefore, it is imperative that a Fundamental Duty to this effect be added to the Constitution.


For a better society


Duty to prevent civil wrongs: It is not enough that a citizen refrains from committing wrong; he has a duty to see that fellow citizens do not indulge in the commission of wrongs.


Duty to raise voice against injustice: Today people seem to have stopped reacting to atrocities; they neither report crimes nor volunteer to testify in a court. The duties of a victim or a witness can be classified into two main categories, viz. duty to report a crime and duty to testify in court. The state must also on its part work to ensure that the fight to bring the offender to book does not become a Kafkaesque nightmare for the victim or witness.


Duty to protect whistle-blowers: With the coming into force of the Right to Information Act, 2005, every citizen has become a “potential whistle-blower”. While the state has a great deal of responsibility in providing for their protection through appropriate legislative instruments, the responsibility to protect torchbearers of transparency vests on each one of us.


Duty to support bona fide civil society movements: Citizens have a moral duty to organise themselves or support citizen groups so that the gaps in governance left by the executive can be filled and the rights guaranteed by the Constitution are made available to every citizen. Therefore, it is proposed that there must be an addition to Part IV-A of the Constitution to that effect.


Reinvigorating civic responsibility: In the modern context, it has become increasingly important to instil a reinvigorated sense of civic responsibility among Indian citizens. This can be achieved by adding new duties to the existing list of Fundamental Duties while also laying emphasis on the performance of the existing ones. The significance of Fundamental Duties is not diminished by the fact that there is no punishment prescribed for not following them. Fundamental Duties constitute the conscience of our Constitution; they should be treated as constitutional values that must be propagated by all citizens.


It appears our polity is not even aware of such a noble part of our Constitution. This should be included in the curriculum of high school students at least.


 


Why citizens are not performing fundamental duties enshrined in Article 51A of the Constitution of India? 


By   Ashok  Arora


 


I recently filed a PIL, Ashok Arora V/S Union of India (Civil Writ 314/2016) stating a shocking fact, but the bitter realty that 99.9% citizens including the Supreme Court lawyers, judges and the parliamentarians don’t perform their fundamental duties enshrined in Article 51A of the Constitution of India.


We all know that article 51A of the constitution, which defines the fundamental duties of a citizen, enjoins upon every citizen to develop the spirit of enquiry and scientific temper. It enjoins upon us to abide by the constitution, which starts with a pledge to secure for all its citizens, justice social, economic and political. The dream of the framers of the constitution to ‘wipe the last tear from the last eye’ is nowhere near realization; rather millions of fellow citizens go to bed on an empty stomach.


More than two lac fifty thousand farmers committed suicide during the last fifteen years. Millions have no access to clean drinking water, basic health facilities and primary education and the majority of degree holder youth are unemployable.


Also Read: Constitution of India is Not Available Free to the Citizens


The real cause of miseries to the millions of fellow human beings is the lack of training of mind & soul, not developing the spirit of enquiry as mandated by the Constitution of India. We have no time to develop that spirit of enquiry and scientific temper as envisaged in the constitution of India.


We all want our rights without performing the fundamental duties. The question is that how can we think of building a nation without building the national character? And how can we build the national character without performing the fundamental duties like developing the spirit of enquiry? The lack of ‘training of mind and soul (pure conscience)’ to provide value education leads to non-performance and corruption, which leads to miseries to the fellow citizens.


The state has failed to provide any opportunity and facilities to children to develop in a healthy manner and in condition of freedom and dignity as enjoined under article 39(f) of the constitution of India. It has further failed to protect the youth against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment as enjoined in the same article of the constitution of India. It has also failed in its endeavour to provide (within a period of ten years from the commencement of our constitution) for free and compulsory education (Purposeful Education) for all children until they complete the age of fourteen years as mandated by the constitution of India.


That article 51A (h) is the most important provision of the constitution, which mandates for every citizen to develop scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of enquiry. The successive governments for the last 69 years, the state has failed to create awareness, it has failed to inform the citizens of the fundamental duties and it has failed to create an atmosphere where every citizen performs his fundamental duties. It has failed to implement the recommendations made by various education committees appointed to suggest educational reforms.


My Public Interest Litigation has been filed to seek directions that the states implement the recommendations made by various education committees on educational reforms, states provide for compulsory education (purposeful education), it performs its duty to make people aware of their fundamental duties, creates an atmosphere where everyone performs his fundamental duties, it defines the real meaning of education as per the recommendations of various committees & the meaning of education suggested by great philosophers and make necessary changes in the education system accordingly.


 I also sought permission to assist the court with reference to my module for training of the mind and soul, which I prepared with reference to my study of holistic personality development, child development, Holy Scriptures and views of philosophers, saints and educationists. I started the study of child development even before the birth of my son, thirty two years ago and eleven years back decided to renounce a lucrative law practice to dedicate myself to guide the youth. I have tried to make my humble contribution by writing a few books and articles on the subject.


My film, ‘Kasoor Kiska”, which is referred in this petition also suggests the ways to guide and motivate the youth to work towards nation building. I have had the privilege to deliver hundreds of free talks in Leh-Ladakh and many remote areas of Jammu & Kashmir, UP, MP, Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Delhi and Maharashtra. I interacted with many students and educationists at many places in Harvard, Oxford, Switzerland, USA, Canada, Germany and Dubai etc. I wish to refer to a few of my YouTube talks and pictures to demonstrate that the youth is enthusiastic and in fact, hungry to listen to good things.


Unfortunately they are not being guided appropriately.  They are all good and they all want to serve, but they do not have any role models. The problem throughout the world is same that the education system is producing computers and not compassionate human beings. That is why even after 69 years of independence and 66 years of the history of Supreme Court of India we have not produced a single statesman like Dr. BR Ambedkar, Bhagat Singh, Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Sardar Patel or Sir Sayed Ahmed. The world is investing more in making of bombs than in producing compassionate human beings, which is the main reason for sufferings and violence all over the world.


Knowing your wisdom, expertise and vast experience, dear citizens  I wish to seek your guidance. I request my dear citizens to initiate a debate, file an intervention or write an article to guide the law students and the society on the above subject. I am in Texas; US these days but keep coming to India as and when required. Kindly indicate the best time to have a telephonic conference with you. I can email you the petition and the whatsapp video message I sent to the Honb’le CJI, which also initiated the debate as to whether a whatsapp message can be treated as PIL.


I argued the matter before Court 1 on 9th May and now it is listed for 19th July. I also wish to discuss with you what transpired on the first listing.


 


 


http://www.livelaw.in/breaking-erring-prosecutors-and-investigating-officers-must-be-proceeded-against-in-case-of-unmerited-acquittals-and-wrongful-convictions-sc-download-the-judgment/


 






PIL –  Fundamental  Duties of Citizens  Vs Corrupt Government  Officials


 


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION


 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017


 


 IN THE MATTER OF


 


 NAGARAJA . M.R


 editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice


# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,


Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State


....Petitioner


 


Versus


 


Honourable  Chief Justice of India    & Others


 ....Respondents


 


 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.


 


 To ,


Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion


Justices of the Supreme Court of India.


 


The Humble petition of the   Petitioner above named.


 


MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :


1. Facts of the case:


 


 Fundamental  Duties of  Citizens  and  Constitutional Duties  of  Public Servants are complementary to each other.   Nowadays  criminalization of politics , judiciary  , police , etc has  taken place and many unfit candidates are in public service. These corrupt , unfit public servants  are misusing their offices and  putting  legal seal    on illegal  acts , making those illegal acts technically legal. Here  raises the conflict between  FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF AN INDIAN CITIZEN  and   ILLEGAL  ACTS  OF  GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.


           For example real estate mafia grabs  BEML Quarters lake ,  Kaynes Hootagalli Lake , Ningaih lake , Hebbal lakes in mysuru  creates  fake title deeds  and  even gets it registered  by sub registrar  all with the help corrupt officials in  government.  Even police protect the  rich  land grabber. When a case is made out in the court of law  for eviction of lake encroachers , judge simply goes through the technicalities of government documents. Based  on official documents he  gives a green signal to encroacher and orders for  protection of his encroached properties.  Lakes  are  nobody’s property , it is  a public property and to be preserved for public usage.  The good Samaritan Indian Citizen who did his  “Fundamental Duties  of Protecting Lakes “  lost money , time,  faced  abuses / remarks from the judge , faced life threat from land mafia & police. All for nothing.


One more example  , a  citizen while passing through a  public  road  witnesses  an accident , takes the injured to the hospital for emergency treatment to save life and informs  police regarding accident making vehicle. Instead of appreciating  his  good   work , police fits  him in the case , case drags on for years making the good citizen loose his money , time & job. Also , he is threatened by vehicle owner  who made the accident , no protection to  the citizen for doing his :Fundamental Duties”.


          One more example , a citizen complained to authorities  regarding  business of a liquor bar  in a residential location  much close to religious  building & schools. The bar owner had secured license from state excise  department much against the norms.  Police called the good citizen for questioning repeatedly , court  judge called him to court repeatedly  and finally based on the license given by corrupt government official  allowed the bar to operate  , fined the complainant.  Goons of bar owner  roughed up the good citizen making him to move away from the locality itself.   


 


           An Indian citizen  requests  for information from authorities  regarding  llegalities , irregularities , misuse of office  in working  by judges , police , etc  from  supreme court of india and other related authorities under RTI Act. So that  based on RTI  reply from concerned authorities  he can legally prosecute  the guilty judges , police , public servants , can get the  injustices rectified by court of law and  put an end to further crimes by those guilty , corrupt public servants all in public interest. This  is an effort by that Indian citizen as his “FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES”  to uphold law , constitution of india. But  PIOs , RTI Appellate authorities  of  supreme court of  india  & other  bodies didn’t  give full truthful information at all . Thereby ,  they  committed one more crime of  of covering up another crime  and aiding criminals to continue with their crimes unabated.  Thereby , guilty judges , police , other public servants obstructed the  citizen from performing his FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES , Violated his FUNNDAMENTAL  RIGHTS  &  HUMAN  RIGHTS  TO  EQUITABLE  JUSTICE.  No justice in sight till date to good Samaritan Indian citizen  , more injustices were meted out to him by judges , police , public servants -  he suffered  physical assaults , murder attempts , jobs denied , news paper closed , press accreditation  denied ,  PILS  he  sent  to apex court were not admitted , all to silence him.


 


 


       In this way , there are numerous cases  of  Indian Citizens , whistle blowers , RTI Activists , Journalists  who themselves suffered  gross injustices for raising public causes , for doing their  Fundamental Duties. No  Justice to them even from apex court till date.


Every citizen  of  india must  perform   his / her “Fundamental  Duties” without fail, before demanding  his fundamental rights. Every public servant  must  do their  constitutional duties without fail. 


         A citizen performs  fundamental duties without any rewards or pay or perks  where as a government official /  public servant does his / her duties  for  huge pay & perks.


         A citizen  while performing his fundamental duties  often has to spend his own money , time  to fight legal cases , etc. Whereas a public servant spends nothing during the course of his public duties, everything is borne by state exchequer.


      A citizen  while performing  his fundamental duties faces rowdy elements , physical assaults  in few instances even resulting in his own murder.  His family doesn’t get even a penny compensation from exchequer. Whereas a public servant enjoys the full police protection in the course of his duties and even if  anything untoward  happens his family will get  compensation.


     Obstructing  a Citizen  from performing his fundamental duties  doesn’t  attract any legal prosecution whereas obstruction of  public servant’s  constitutional duties is a crime under IPC.


2. Question(s) of Law:


Are  Fundamental  Duties  of  Indian  Citizens  Supreme  or  the  Illegal  acts , orders by corrupt Government officials (Legalizing  illegal acts)  Supreme ?


3. Grounds:


Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of   corrupt  judges , police , public servants   responsible for  injustices , obstructions to Fundamental Duties of citizens.


 4. Averment:


 Please read details at :


 Traitors  in  Judiciary &  Police


https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police   ,


 


Crimes  by  Khaki


https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki   


 


FIRST  Answer  Judges  Police


https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police  


 


SHAME  SHAME  JUDGEs  -  Atrocities against  DALITs  by  Judges


https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-judges  ,


https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/shame-shame-judges


 


“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”


- Mahatma Gandhi


 


Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the  cases  mentioned  at above web sites , to perform their duties & to answer the questions.


 The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common men & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth  crores  of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.


 


PRAYER:


In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:


 


1.         To  make  obstruction of  “Fundamental Duties  of an Indian Citizen” a legally punishable offence on par with the  obstruction of a public servant’s duties.


2.         To pay compensation of Rupees Two Crores and above  to   RTI Activists , Whistle Blowers , Journalists , ordinary citizens who paid with their lives or suffered  injuries in the course of their  fundamental duties.


3.         To order for  inspection , investigation of each & every issue raised by  a citizen in the course of his fundamental duties  instead of simply relying on government records alone prepared by corrupt officials.


4.         To order all public servants including judges , Members of Parliament , Members of Legislative Assemblies , IAS officers  , other public servants  to do their  constitutional duties  as well as their   FUNDAMENTAL  DUTIES  properly.


5. To admit  all the PILs   sent by me to supreme court of india  and to order the concerned public servants to give proper reply to all RTI Appeals made by me.


 


FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.


 


Dated : 26.02.2017……… ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.


 Place :   Mysuru , India…………………….   PETITIONER-IN-PERSON


 


A Critical Study of the Fundamental Duties under the Constitution of India as Legally Enforceable Duties under Different Statutes


By – Mohit Daulatani


 


Constitution is the supreme law of India. It is the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world, containing 448 articles in 25 parts, 12 schedules and 97 amendments. Besides the English version, there is an official Hindi translation. B. R. Ambedkar is the Chief Architect of Indian Constitution.Constitution was enacted by the Constituent Assembly on 26 November 1949, and came into effect on 26 January 1950. Date 26 January was chosen to commemorate the Purna Swaraj declaration of independence of 1930.


 


It declares India to be a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic, assuring its citizens of justice, equality, and liberty, and endeavours to promote fraternity among them. Constitution was formed on the 26th of November in 1949 by the Constituent Assembly and came into force on the 26th of January 1950. Fundamental Duties of the citizens of India mentioned in Article 51A of the Indian Constitution. By the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution, adopted in 1976, Fundamental Duties of the citizens have also been enumerated.


The Fundamental duties have been incorporated in the constitution to remind every citizen that they should not only be conscious of their rights but also of their duties. The concept of Fundamental Duties was taken from the constitution of USSR along with the concept of Five Year Plan.


 


The Fundamental Rights in Part III, the Directive Principles of State Policy in Part IV and the Fundamental Duties in Part IVA forms a compendium and have to be read together. It is true that there is no legal sanction provided for violation or non-performance of Fundamental Duties. There is neither specific provision for enforceability nor any specific prohibition. However, Fundamental Duties have an inherent element of compulsion regarding compliance. Out of the ten clauses in article 51A, five are positive duties and the other five are negative duties. Clauses (b), (d), (f), (h) and (j) require the citizens to perform these Fundamental Duties actively. It is said that by their nature, it is not practicable to enforce the Fundamental Duties and they must be left to the will and aspiration of the citizens. However, in the case of citizens holding public office, each and all Fundamental Duties can be enforced by suitable legislation and departmental rules of conduct. Appropriate sanctions can be provided for lapse in respect of each Fundamental Duty and it is quite practicable to enforce the sanction against every citizen holding a public office; for instance, departmental promotions can be deferred, increments can be withheld, etc. If an officer takes part in a strike or stalls the proceedings of his institution, he can be made to forgo the salary for that day.


 


For the proper enforcement of duties, it is necessary that it should be known to all. This should be done by a systematic and intensive education of people that is by publicity or by making it a part of education. The Law minister has himself suggested it.


 


In M.C. Mehta (2) v. Union of India, the Supreme Court has held that under Art. 51-A (g) it is the duty of the Central Government to introduce compulsory teaching of lessons at least for one hour in a week on protection and improvement of natural environment in all the educational institution of the country.


 


In AIIMS Students Union v. AIIMS, speaking about the importance of Fundamental Duties enriched in Article 51-A while striking down the institutional reservation of 33% in AIIMS coupled with 50% reservation discipline wise as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said that they are equally important like fundamental rights.


2. Inception of the Indian Constitution


The Constitution of India came into force on 26 January 1950. Since then, the day is celebrated as Republic Day. However, before 1950, 26 January was called Independence Day. Since 26 January 1930, it was the day on which thousands of people, in villages, in mohallas, in towns, in small and big groups would take the independence pledge, committing them to the complete independence of India from British rule. It was only fitting that the new republic should come into being on that day, marking from its very inception the continuity between the struggle for independence and the adoption of the Constitution that made India a Republic.


 


The process of the evolution of the Constitution began many decades before 26 January 1950 and has continued unabated since. Its origins lie deeply embedded in the struggle for independence from Britain and in the movements for responsible and constitutional government in the princely states. Constitution is the supreme law of India. It is the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world, containing 448 articles in 25 parts, 12 schedules and 97 amendments. Besides the English version, there is an official Hindi translation. B. R. Ambedkar is the Chief Architect of Indian Constitution. Constitution was enacted by the Constituent Assembly on 26 November 1949, and came into effect on 26 January 1950.[5]


 


It declares India to be a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic, assuring its citizens of justice, equality, and liberty, and endeavours to promote fraternity among them. Constitution was formed on the 26th of November in 1949 by the Constituent Assembly and came into force on the 26th of January 1950. Fundamental Duties of the citizens of India mentioned in Article 51A of the Indian Constitution. By the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution, adopted in 1976, Fundamental Duties of the citizens have also been enumerated.


 


In 1946, the British decided to examine the possibility of granting independence to India. As a result, a British cabinet mission was despatched to India to hold discussions with the representatives of British India and the Indian States in order to agree on the framework for writing a constitution, and, to set up a constituent body and an executive council. Following this mission and the ensuing negotiations, a Constituent Assembly was indirectly elected by the provincial legislatures comprising 278 representatives and 15 women. Parties represented in the CA were the Congress Party which had a majority, Muslim League, Scheduled Caste Federation, the Indian Communist Party and the Union Party. The CA met for the first time in December 1946 and by November 1949 the draft constitution was approved. The constitution went into effect in January 1950 and the CA was transformed into a Provisional Parliament.


 


The Constitution which is still in force has been amended over 90 times making it one of the most frequently amended constitutions in the world. It is also known to be one of the longest and most detailed in the world with 395 articles and 10 appendixes called schedules.


Key timelines in the 1948 constitutional process


1946     Britain decides on to grant independence to India and cabinet mission is dispatched to India to discuss modalities for transfer of power


14 August 1947 Proposal for creation of committees is tabled


29 August 1947 Drafting committee is established


6 December 1947          Constituent Assembly formally convenes for the first time, following elections, to start the process of writing a constitution.


4 November 1947          Draft is finalized and submitted


1948 – 1949      Constituent Assembly meets in sessions open to the public


26 November 1949         Constituent Assembly adopts final draft making it official


26 January 1950            Entry into force of the new constitution


 


3. Fundamental Duties


Fundamental Duties of the citizens of India mentioned in Article 51A of the Indian Constitution. By the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution, adopted in 1976, Fundamental Duties of the citizens have also been enumerated.


 


Following are the Fundamental Duties under the Constitution of India which is given in Part IV-A of the Constitution of India which was inserted by the (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976.


It shall be the duty of every citizens of India-


a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;


 


b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;


 


c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;


 


d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;


 


e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;


 


f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;


 


g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures;


 


h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;


 


i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;


 


j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.]


 


[(k) who is a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six and fourteen years.]


 


The Fundamental duties have been incorporated in the constitution to remind every citizen that they should not only be conscious of their rights but also of their duties. The concept of Fundamental Duties was taken from the constitution of USSR along with the concept of Five Year Plan.


 


Part IV-A of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, in accordance with the recommendations of the Swaran Singh Committee in order to bring out Constitution in line with Article 29 (1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 and the Constitutions of countries like Japan, China, U.S.S.R. etc.


Article 29 (1) of the Universal Declaration of Human rights, 1948, states:


“Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.”


 


It is the basic principle of jurisprudence that every right has a correlative duty and every duty has a correlative Right. But the rule is not absolute. It is subject to certain exceptions in the sense that a person may have a right, but there may not be a correlative duty.


 


In Chandra Bhawan Boarding v. State of Mysore, the Supreme court made the following observation prior to the insertion of Article 51-A:


 


“It is a fallacy to think that our Constitution, there are only rights and no duties. The provisions in Part IV enables the legislature to build a welfare society and that object may be achieved to the extent the Directive Principles are implemented by legislation.”


 


The Supreme Court has referred to these duties in the context of clause (g)--pollution matters and Clause (j)--excellence in the civil service.


 


In A.I.I.M.S. Student’s Union v. A.I.I.M.S., a three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court made it clear that fundamental duties, though not enforceable by a writ of the court, yet provide valuable guidance and aid to interpretation and resolution of constitutional and legal issues. In case of doubt, peoples’ wish as expressed through Article 51-A can serve as a guide not only for resolving the issue but also for constructing or moulding the relief to be given by the courts. The fundamental duties must be given their full meaning as expected by the enactment of the Forty-second Amendment.


 


In Mohan Kumar Singhania v. Union of India, a governmental decision to give utmost importance to the training programme of the indian Administrative Service selectees was upheld by deriving support from Article 51-A (i) of the Constitution, holding that the governmental decision was in consonance with one of the fundamental duties.


 


In Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh, a complete ban and closing of mining operation carried on in Mussoorie hills was held to be sustainable by deriving support from the fundamental duty as enshrined in Article 51-A (g) of the Constitution. The court held that preservation of the environment and keeping the ecological balance unaffected in a task which not only government but also every citizen must undertake. It is a social obligation of the state as well as of the individuals.


4. Enforceability of Fundamental Duties


The fundamental duties enjoined on citizen under Article 51-A should also guide the legislative and executive actions of elected or non-elected institutions and organisations of the citizens including the municipal bodies.


 


Duties are observed by individuals as a result of dictates of the social system the environment in which one lives, under the influence of role models, or on account of punitive provisions of law. It may be necessary to enact suitable legislation wherever necessary to require obedience of obligations by the citizens. If the existing laws are inadequate to enforce the needed discipline, the legislative vacuum needs to be filled. If legislation and judicial directions are available and still there are violations of duties by the citizens, this would call for other strategies for making them operational.


 


The legal utility of fundamental duties is similar to that of the directives; while the Directives are addressed to the state, so are the duties addressed to the citizens, without any legal sanction for their violation. The citizen, it is expected, should be his own monitor while exercising and enforcing his Fundamental rights. He should keep in mind that he owes the duties specified in Article 51-A to the State and if he does not care for the duties, he does not deserve the rights.


 


of course, the duties as such are not legally enforceable in the Courts of law, but if a law has been made to prohibit any act or conduct in violation of the duties, it would be reasonable restriction on the relevant Fundamental Rights.


 


However, the fundamental Duties are not enforceable by mandamus or any other legal remedy


 


Directions to State/Central Government.—Since the Fundamental Duties are not addressed to the State, a citizen cannot claim that he must be properly equipped by the state so that he may perform his duties under Article 51-A. However, the Supreme Court has issued directions to the States, having regard to Article 51-A (g).


 


Protection of environmental—Duty of.—In view of the duty to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild-life and to have compassion for living creatures imposed on the citizens under Article 51-A (g) of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has held that it is a duty of the Central Government to take a number of steps in order to make this provision effective, and issued the following directions to the Central Government—


 


a) To direct all educational institutions throughout India to give weekly lessons in the first ten classes, relating to the protection and improvement of the natural environment including forest, lake, rivers and wild life.


 


b) To get text books written for the said purpose and to distribute them free of cost.


 


c) To introduce short term courses for training of teachers who teach this subject.


 


d) Not only the Central Government but also the State Government and local authorities are to introduce cleanliness weeks when all citizens including member of Executive, the Legislature and the judiciary should render free personal service to keep their local areas free from pollution of land, water and air.


 


5. Conclusion


The Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties are sections of the Constitution of India that prescribe the fundamental obligations of the State to its citizens and the duties of the citizens to the State. The Fundamental Duties are defined as the moral obligations of all citizens to help promote a spirit of patriotism and to uphold the unity of India. These duties, set out in Part IV–A of the Constitution concern individuals and the nation. Citizens are morally obligated by the Constitution to perform these duties. The Fundamental Duties are however, not legally enforceable, i.e. without any legal sanction in case of their violation or non-compliance.


 


There is a need for these duties to be obligatory for all citizens, subject to the State enforcing the same by means of a valid law, or else the law stands in a very disadvantageous position. The Supreme Court has finally, issued directions to the State in this regard, with a view towards making the provisions effective and enabling a citizens to properly perform their duties properly. This project was an attempt to check the enforceability of the fundamental duties under the different statutes, which have been references to the Indian Constitution.


 


Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761, HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA     Cell : 91 8970318202

  WhatsApp  91  8970318202

 

 

Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in       

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com 

 

 Contact  :  editor@dalitonline.in   ,

 editor.dalitonline@gmail.com