Dalit-Online
Dalit-Online
Daily e news paper
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.16.....Issue.50............22/05/2020
Editorial : Lax Labour Laws
Before covid 19 crisis during good times, there were only few responsible industrialists and the rest exploited labor by greasing inspector raj. For ease of doing business inspector raj must be minimum , corruption in government departments must be tackled, but enforcement of bare laws must be intoto. Ease of doing business doesn't mean exploitation of labor.
As labourers need job opportunities, so does an entrepreneur need labourers to convert his resources into profit. Need of the hour is responsible behaviour by both industrialists and labourers. Corporate governance laws, share holder accountability is need of the hour considering spate of bank collapses, swindling industrialists, huge NPAs. Already Successive governments have gifted industrialists with tax cuts , interest waiver and finally crores worth loan waivers. What such industrialists have given to their labourers ? What commensurate benefits government has given to labourers – NIL. There must be an end to the greediness of industrialists.
Azim Premji defends workers’ rights as many states dilute labour laws
Writing in the Economic Times, the founder of software services provider Wipro said that dilution of such laws would only exacerbate the conditions of low wage workers.
By ARCHANA CHAUDHARY
Indian billionaire Azim Premji cautioned states against diluting already lax labor laws, saying this was the time for shielding the economically vulnerable from hardships caused by a nationwide lockdown.
“It was shocking to hear that various state governments, encouraged by businesses, are considering suspending — or have already suspended — many of the labor laws that protect workers,” Premji, the founder of Indian software services provider Wipro Ltd., wrote in the Economic Times newspaper. “The migrant workers we find fending for themselves and their families have almost no social security and too little — not too much — worker protection.”
Migrant workers form part of India’s vast informal sector and are among the worst hit by the shutdown imposed since March 25, as businesses shuttered operations and left them with no jobs and incomes. With Prime Minister Narendra Modi relaxing some of the restrictions to enable the resumption of economic activity, workers’ interests appear poised to be hurt further as some states suspend a variety of labor laws to make doing business easier for the industry.
The labor laws being considered for suspension relate to settling industrial disputes, occupational safety, health and working conditions of workers, and those related to minimum wages, trade unions, contract workers, and migrant laborers, Premji wrote.
“It will only exacerbate the conditions of low wage workers and the way we do business and industry,” he said, while calling for more measures to boost the economy, including scaling up the existing rural employment guarantee program and introducing an urban employment guarantee plan.
Modi has pledged a $265 billion package to support the economy, including offering cheap credit to workers and farmers hurt by the lockdown.
Premji is not the only industry captain to voice his concerns on the treatment of workers. Rajiv Bajaj, managing director of Bajaj Auto Ltd., has criticized India’s handling of the lockdown. In an interview, Bajaj called the extension of the lockdown to contain the virus as “piecemeal, arbitrary and erratic.”
Government Should Ask Private Sector to Work as Not-for-Profit for Three Years
Instead of making India's workers sacrifice their rights, the economic crisis caused by the coronavirus and lockdown is best tackled by temporarily turning businesses into trusts and limiting salary differentials.
Arundhati Dhuru and Sandeep Pandey
All the claims and narratives of a progressing nation – Rajiv Gandhi’s ‘marching into the 21st century,’ Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s ‘India Shining,’ A.P.J. Abdul Kalam’s ‘providing urban amenities in rural areas,’ Manmohan Singh’s achievement of 8-9% GDP growth rates and Narendra Modi’s ‘smart cities’ – have crumbled in the wake of the national level migrant workers’ crisis during the coronavirus lockdown.
The phenomenon of lakhs of workers marching, cycling or hitchhiking home hundreds of kilometres away has not been seen anywhere else in the world either because nowhere do people migrate in such large numbers for jobs or because other governments took care of their workers better than in India.
How shameful that a country desiring to be a global economic and military power doesn’t have the wherewithal or the political will to take care of its poor. When the poor needed succour most, they were simply abandoned. Inspite of the Constitution of India being formally guided by the concept of ‘socialism’, this tragedy has also highlighted the discriminatory treatment by government on the basis of class, and by extension caste, as the categories of class and caste in India more or less overlap. While free transportation was arranged for children of the moneyed class, the poor, even if they managed to get onto a train or a bus, were made to pay – because of which, in some cases, they abandoned the idea of travel.
Opening up the sale of liquor on May 4, 2020, effectively made a mockery of the lockdown when the police gave up attempts to prevent people from gathering in crowds. The people who lined up in front of liquor shops were the poor, not the rich – just as it was the poor who queued up outside banks during demonetisation. Hence the government not only deliberately allowed the poor to risk their health by assembling in this way but also took away from them whatever little cash they had which could have been spent on buying food or healthcare for their families.
To add insult to injury, workers are now expected to give up their basic rights. A number of state governments have suspended various labour laws to varying degrees for different time periods. Uttar Pradesh has suspended all but five labour laws for three years and in Gujarat, workers will be made to work for extra hours but not paid adequately for that. May Day is celebrated as labour rights day around the world because it was on May 1 in 1886 that American workers in Chicago resolved not to work for more than eight hours a day. But the Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Punjab, Gujarat, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and UP governments have shown scant regard for this hard won right and issued ordinances which may not stand the scrutiny of law even if they are passed by their respective legislative assemblies. When the Uttar Pradesh Workers’ Front approached the high court with a public interest litigation, the government quietly withdrew its May 8 order permitting 12 hours of work per day and 72 hours per week without additional payment for overtime, before the next hearing date.
The prime minister views all the discomfort borne by workers as a sacrifice for the nation. He has chosen the most exploited class of society for inflicting sacrifices which they are indeed making by losing their jobs and incomes, dying in accidents on roads or railway tracks while going back home or simply going through the excruciating experience of walking for hundreds of kilometres with all their belongings and without any guarantee of food or water. In some cases, families with children have made this arduous journey. It is a matter of national shame that our workers are subjected to this humiliating treatment.
If workers can make sacrifices why not others, especially the business class, which anyway has surplus accumulated income? If workers are expected to give up the guarantees of working hours and minimum wages, why don’t we ask industrialists to work without profit for the next three years? All private companies could be converted to trusts with a board of trustees replacing the board of directors and a managing trustee replacing the owner.
Everybody working for the company could be paid salaries decent enough for survival. After all, isn’t that what we are expecting from the workers? This is precisely the advice Mahatma Gandhi had for owners of big businesses. He suggested that they must consider themselves as trustees of all the assets controlled by them meant for common good of human society. Hence, everybody could get a salary according to their skill but it would be desirable to follow the principle laid down by another important political thinker of the country, Ram Manohar Lohia – that the difference between the incomes of the poorest and richest should not be more than ten times.
If this standard is adopted by all organisations and governments, India will be able to deal with the setback to its economy due to the lockdown in an effective manner. If the minimum daily wages under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act is Rs. 202 in UP, then the maximum salary anybody should draw in government or private sector in UP should not exceed Rs. 2020 per day or Rs. 60,600 in a month.
Any profit above total expenditure of private companies for the next three years should go to the government treasury and the government could waive income tax for this duration. If the National Food Security Act extends its coverage universally and education, health care, transport, communication systems and banks are all run as trusts rather than for-profit enterprises, then there is no reason why any family should be unable to meet all its expenses.
Free education and free heath care is a policy followed by many countries successfully. Giving priority to public transport over private motorised vehicles is another such sound policy. If people with an inclination for service, as we witnessed a number of them during relief work, were to take up service sector positions and work on an honorary basis or for a minimum salary, governance could really improve and corruption could be brought under check. Hence, by a wise selection of policy measures the cost of living can be brought down. In the coronavirus lockdown almost everybody was down to fulfilling only their basic needs, giving up most of the comforts and facilities of modern living. What was forced upon us could slowly become a subject of voluntary acceptance.
Unless such austerity measures are followed we may not be able to recover from the crisis we’re in.
Editorial : Sacrifice by not workers alone Entrepreneurs too a must
Entrepreneurs, Industrialists enjoy various benefits from government during good times, at the expense of tax payer. Now during economic downslide too e joying benefits from goverment at the cost of poor tax payers. On top of it there are few industrialists swindling banks , public to the tune of crores of rupees and government goes an extra mile to waive off those NPAs. What is the contribution of these industrialists to the nation apart from their selfish goal of making profits.
Industrialists only want flexible labor laws, easy licensing
System, above all easy money from banks / share market. Fine. Why NOT Corporate Governance Laws, Share holder accountability, Environmental accountability ?
It is workers who always sacrifice to nation building but suffer the most. Who are anti nationals – Workers , Industrialists or Public Servants ?
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL
,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA Cell : 91 8970318202
WhatsApp 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in
https://dalit-online.blogspot.com
Contact : editor@dalitonline.in , editor.dalitonline@gmail.com
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment
›
Home
View web version
About Me
Dalit-Online
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.
No comments:
Post a Comment